2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2015.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of single questions and brief questionnaire with longer validated food frequency questionnaire to assess adequate fruit and vegetable intake

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Self‐reported PCOS diagnosis was strengthened through collection of supporting self‐report information on the use of blood tests or ultrasound to confirm diagnosis. While the use of more comprehensive assessments of dietary intake would have strengthened the study further, the use of single‐item questions for key food items such as fruit and vegetable intake are considered a reasonable proxy …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self‐reported PCOS diagnosis was strengthened through collection of supporting self‐report information on the use of blood tests or ultrasound to confirm diagnosis. While the use of more comprehensive assessments of dietary intake would have strengthened the study further, the use of single‐item questions for key food items such as fruit and vegetable intake are considered a reasonable proxy …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the C-FFQ, recommendations [21] and other similar studies were considered, and the C-FFQ was compared with the validated EFSA-Q, which contains several common elements, and with a 24HDR [12,21,[25][26][27]. Both approximations have been widely used as reference methods for developing new FFQ.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C-FFQ includes a quite considerable number of foods with cocoa, that are absent in the EFSA-Q and also in other questionnaires with more items [20,22,27]. For this reason, the total frequency of cocoa product consumption was much higher in the C-FFQ than in the EFSA-Q.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison and validation of short tools such as the one conducted by Cook et al 20 supports its use to establish population needs. The fact Cook et al found that using a SQ for assessing fruit consumption, a SQ for vegetable consumption and a 5 item Vegetable Fruit Questionnaire (VFQ) could replace a longer FFQ for estimation of population intakes of these foods and for screening its adequacy is an interesting finding, and is valuable and give some alternatives to the tradi-…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Take large amounts of time to apply 11 Less time consuming 11 Gives information about the food intake of the previous 24 hours 13 Can be for specific foods such as identifying beverage or fruit intake 20,21 Better for assessing individual intake at defined periods 13 Better for assessing usual intake 10 Limited use in large prospective studies 13 Better for using in large prospective studies 13 Require special training for interviewing 11 Better tool to be self-administered 11 Under and over reporting of some foods 14 Can give higher estimates of the intake of some foods particularly of those socially acceptable foods 11 It is suggested that two 24 h recalls are made and the 5 pass method is the result of reducing the underreporting bias 15 Depends of how many food items are being questioned and how are the frequency required 10 tional, more complex tools.…”
Section: Hour Dietary Recall Food Frequency Questionnaire (Ffq)mentioning
confidence: 99%