2008
DOI: 10.1589/jpts.20.243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Smoothness during Gait between Community Dwelling Elderly Fallers and Non-Fallers Using Power Spectrum Entropy of Acceleration Time-Series

Abstract: Abstract. [Purpose] We have proposed in a previous paper a novel indicator of smoothness using the power spectrum entropy of acceleration time-series during movement. In this paper, we describe this indicator's ability to distinguish between fallers' and non-fallers' gait in community dwelling elderly. This novel indicator is simple to use and can directly evaluate gait.[Subjects] Two hundred and fifty-one subjects (age = 71.0 ± 7.7) were categorized fallers (39) and non-fallers (191) based on their histories… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the partial regression coefficient of WS with GS as a dependent variable was larger than that of GS with WS as a dependent variable for both sexes, the possibility of a path from WS to GS was indicated. A significant positive correlation between GS and WS has been reported; however, this relationship has not been verified using covariance structure analysis or logistic regression analysis. Although both GS and WS are included in the diagnostic criteria for both physical frailty, as proposed by Fried, and sarcopenia, as defined by the Group on Sarcopenia in Older People, the diagnostic flows of the two are different.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…As the partial regression coefficient of WS with GS as a dependent variable was larger than that of GS with WS as a dependent variable for both sexes, the possibility of a path from WS to GS was indicated. A significant positive correlation between GS and WS has been reported; however, this relationship has not been verified using covariance structure analysis or logistic regression analysis. Although both GS and WS are included in the diagnostic criteria for both physical frailty, as proposed by Fried, and sarcopenia, as defined by the Group on Sarcopenia in Older People, the diagnostic flows of the two are different.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The five best performing models, in terms of overall accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity, used neural networks [47,48], naive Bayesian classifier [41], Mahalanobis cluster analysis [46], and a decision tree [49]. The five worst performing models used regression [44,53,62,72] and a support vector machine [51]. Therefore, intelligent computing methods (neural networks, Bayesian classifiers, etc.)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regression analysis suggested that AC-VT may have an advantage over other physical performance test parameters for assessing the risk of falling. Previous studies have suggested that acceleration variability was correlated with physical performance and can identify patients at a higher risk for falls (Kojima et al, 2008;Arai et al, 2011;Yamada et al, 2012). This is consistent with our study; previous studies investigating risk factors for falling have shown that gait analysis with accelerometery may be superior to other measures of body function and activity such as TUG, five-times-sit-to-stand, gait speed, and functional reach (Kojima et al, 2008;Arai et al, 2011;Doi et al, 2013) because accelerometery data can be used to comprehensively evaluate motor function, including lower extremity muscle strength, standing balance, gait speed, and gait disorder in the older adults, including frail individuals (Hausdorff et al, 2001;Hausdorff, 2005;Palombaro et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, trunk acceleration during gait showed higher discriminatory ability for the risk of falling among healthy older adults than other physical performance tests (Kojima et al, 2008;Doi et al, 2013). Variability in trunk acceleration as assessed by root mean square (RMS) and autocorrelation (AC) can successfully differentiate between fit and frail older adults (Moe-Nilssen and Helbostad, 2005;Senden et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation