The interface is a critical component and plays a dominant role in combining HPLC and FTIR spectrometry. The success or failure of the technique almost exclusively depends on the interface performance. In general, flow cells 1-3 and solvent elimination [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] procedures have been used for the interfacing of HPLC to FTIR. Although more convenient, the usefulness of the flow-cell procedure is limited because the aqueous-based mobile phase, commonly used in reversed phase (RP)-HPLC, strongly absorbs IR radiation in many areas of the IR spectrum, resulting in a loss of sample spectral information. More favorable results can be obtained if a solvent-elimination technique is applied prior to FTIR detection.Wood 4 demonstrated the suitability of particle-beam HPLC-FTIR by depositing column effluents onto a KBr substrate from a normal-phase (NP)-HPLC solvent. This technique was only open to an NP-HPLC eluent, where non-aqueous mobile phase solvents were used. Fujimoto et al. 5 employed stainless-steel wire nets (SSWN) in lieu of applying water-soluble metal halide substrates for RP-HPLC. Solvents were evaporated using a heated nitrogen gas flow, and solutes were trapped in the metal nets. Although the major advantage of the procedure was the insolubility of SSWN in the aqueous phase, it was operated at an extremely low flow rate of 4 µl min -1 . A narrow-bore RP-HPLC-FTIR method was developed by Gagel and Biemann.
6Effluents were continuously deposited onto and evaporated from the surface of a reflective disk using a nitrogen gas nebulizer. The system offered good sensitivity (31 ng for quinoline) and could be used with up to 50% water content at a flow rate of 30 µl min -1 . A commercial version of this interface, the LC-Transform, was applied to determine polymers 7 and steroids. 8 The LC-Transform differs from Gagel and Biemann's system in that the solutes are deposited on the top of a germanium disk with an aluminum coating underneath to increase the absorption by the solutes. However, problems were encountered with both systems when the effluent contained nonvolatile solutes, such as phosphate buffers, which tended to accumulate on the disk.A nebulizing gas, mono-disperse aerosol generation HPLC to the FTIR interface, was developed by Robertson et al. 9,10 The system was capable of vaporizing 100% water at a flow rate of 300 µl min -1 . Although higher concentrations of volatile buffers were used by this interface, only about a 10% deposition efficiency was reported. This system was employed for determining methyl red 9 and caffeine 10 with detection limits of 100 ng and 13 µg, respectively. Griffiths and co-workers 11,12 described an HPLC-FTIR interface based on a concentric flow nebulizer, in which the mobile phase was continuously evaporated as the solutes were deposited onto a ZnSe window. This interface was suitable for NP-and RP-HPLC solvents, including eluents containing low concentrations of volatile buffers. Jansen 13 demonstrated a thermospray interface, whi...