1999
DOI: 10.1366/0003702991947586
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Solvent Elimination Systems for the Analysis of Dyes and Pesticides by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometry

Abstract: Two systems have been compared for the on-line production of infrared spectra of compounds separated by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). System 1 had a thermospray interface to evaporate the mobile-phase solvents and deposit the solutes onto a moving stainless steel belt, for direct analysis by reflection–absorption IR spectrometry. In system 2, the column effluent was split 1:6 and pumped through an ultrasonic nebulizer. The spray was desolvated at reduced pressure in a heated transfer tube and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Detailed descriptions of the interface have been given elsewhere. [15][16][17][18] The column effluents were transferred to the thermospray interface assembly, which was surrounded by a heated nitrogen gas stream supplied by two channels at 5 l min -1 from each channel, which continually flowed down to the thermospray capillary tubing (125 µm i.d. × 1.5 mm o.d.)…”
Section: Hplc-ftir Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Detailed descriptions of the interface have been given elsewhere. [15][16][17][18] The column effluents were transferred to the thermospray interface assembly, which was surrounded by a heated nitrogen gas stream supplied by two channels at 5 l min -1 from each channel, which continually flowed down to the thermospray capillary tubing (125 µm i.d. × 1.5 mm o.d.)…”
Section: Hplc-ftir Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The success or failure of the technique almost exclusively depends on the interface performance. In general, flow cells [1][2][3] and solvent elimination [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] procedures have been used for the interfacing of HPLC to FTIR. Although more convenient, the usefulness of the flow-cell procedure is limited because the aqueous-based mobile phase, commonly used in reversed phase (RP)-HPLC, strongly absorbs IR radiation in many areas of the IR spectrum, resulting in a loss of sample spectral information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…19 This coupled technique was employed to analyze the linear alkylbenzene sulfonate, 20,21 river-water residues, 22 polystyrene samples 23 and pesticides. 24 Because HPLC-FTIR can provide functional-group features, 19,20 it may also provide complementary information to HPLC-MS for dyes. It was of interest to access whether the provided functional-group features by FTIR could give sufficient information to explain the reasons for the different chromatograms given by the formulated and purified reactive dyes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the HPLC-FTIR thermospray interface, some problems were also experienced concerning the use-phase modifiers in the HPLC eluent. [19][20][21][22][23][24][25] In order to analyze dye samples by HPLC-FTIR thermospray, a small-gradient HPLC method has been developed. 25 This paper describes the applicability of an HPLC-FTIR modified thermospray interface for dye analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%