2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.03.202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of some effects of modification of a polylactide surface layer by chemical, plasma, and laser methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it should be noted that 60-s modification time was not sufficient to affect surface geometry. As was reported by Moraczewski et al, longer plasma treatment times (5-30 min) are required for cracks and cavities to occur [30]. On the other hand, the bright spots in the SEM images shown in Figure 4A-D indicate the inclusion of other element impurities in the entire polymer volume, both before and after treatment.…”
Section: Sem Analysissupporting
confidence: 64%
“…However, it should be noted that 60-s modification time was not sufficient to affect surface geometry. As was reported by Moraczewski et al, longer plasma treatment times (5-30 min) are required for cracks and cavities to occur [30]. On the other hand, the bright spots in the SEM images shown in Figure 4A-D indicate the inclusion of other element impurities in the entire polymer volume, both before and after treatment.…”
Section: Sem Analysissupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Since we are interested with the surface modification of 3D printed PLA objects in this review, we excluded all the PLA bulk modification methods such as copolymerization, stereochemical manipulation, blending with plasticizers, other polymers, fillers and other composite materials from the review content. On the other hand, some good reviews were published on the surface modification of PLA polymers in the past [22,[57][58][59][60][61], however, these reviews are mostly on the general plasma treatments of many biopolymers or specific biomedical applications of PLA except the publication of Rasal et al which reports on the specific PLA bulk and surface modifications published till to 2010 [22]. Thus, there is a need to review the literature regarding PLA surface modifications after 2010 and also to select some suitable methods to be applied for the PLA objects which are printed by the FDM approach.…”
Section: Surface Modification Of Pla Solidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oxygen content of the surfaces increases with all three modes, with plasma processing giving the highest. Plasma modifications are deemed to be the most beneficial of the three processes for polymer implants [ 95 ]. Plasma modifications are known to be an effective method to treat the surface of polymers for biomedical applications as these treatments can be selective, yet not affect the bulk polymer characteristics [ 96 , 97 ].…”
Section: Surface Enhancementmentioning
confidence: 99%