2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.sse.2019.03.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of source/drain electrodes in thin-film transistors based on room temperature deposited zinc nitride films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13 This also led to increased research activity on Zn 3 N 2 itself, including first demonstrations of Zn 3 N 2 in the field of thin film transistors (TFTs). [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] Although some band-gap studies on Zn 3 N 2 estimated values of 2.9-3.4 eV, 14,16,23,24 most of the recent studies and theoretical calculations, including photoluminescence measurements, find values in the 0.8-1.5 eV range. 10,15,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] The reason for this large discrepancy lies probably in the tendency of Zn 3 N 2 to oxidize in ambient conditions, 34,39 which could lead to a strong overestimation of the band-gap energy, as masked by the presence of ZnO (with a band-gap in the order of 3.3 eV 40 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 This also led to increased research activity on Zn 3 N 2 itself, including first demonstrations of Zn 3 N 2 in the field of thin film transistors (TFTs). [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] Although some band-gap studies on Zn 3 N 2 estimated values of 2.9-3.4 eV, 14,16,23,24 most of the recent studies and theoretical calculations, including photoluminescence measurements, find values in the 0.8-1.5 eV range. 10,15,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] The reason for this large discrepancy lies probably in the tendency of Zn 3 N 2 to oxidize in ambient conditions, 34,39 which could lead to a strong overestimation of the band-gap energy, as masked by the presence of ZnO (with a band-gap in the order of 3.3 eV 40 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high mobility of Zn 3 N 2 can be partly attributed to its low electron effective mass of m e * = 0.20 m 0 (where m 0 is the rest mass of electrons) at the conduction band minimum (CBM) comprising Zn 4s and N 2s states, , making it a promising active layer for TFTs. However, studies on Zn 3 N 2 TFTs are limited; they all employ ZnO capping layers on top of the Zn 3 N 2 channel layers, and their field-effect mobilities are far below the Hall mobility, as presented in Table S1. The reason underlying the application of the top ZnO layer is not obvious; however, it is known that Zn 3 N 2 TFTs do not operate effectively in the absence of the top ZnO layer, and the reported field-effect mobilities of up to 15.8 cm 2 V –1 s –1 may be affected by the ZnO layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main limitations in the device applications of Zn 3 N 2 are its high residual free electron density and natural degenerate conduction ( N e = 10 18 –10 20 cm –3 in most reports ,, ). First-principles calculations indicate that the Fermi level is pinned at a high level by the donor impurities of O N and H i , causing unintentional natural doping .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%