2017
DOI: 10.1556/606.2017.12.2.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of spatial reconstruction software packages using DSLR images

Abstract: Point cloud based modeling has become widely used in recent years in the engineering practice. This paper presents several point clouds produced by different software packages using pixel based multi view spatial reconstruction. The purpose of the investigation is to give statistical quality measures beyond the apparent differences between the point clouds. Reference measurements have been carried out by terrestrial laser scanning. There are proprietary and free software solutions among the tested programs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It does not mean that mobile images generally enable better models; the applied software has a great impact on the model attributes. There are studies (Somogyi et al, 2017, Barazzetti et al, 2010, Bianconi, et al, 2017 about the effect of combination of devices and software, this is not detailed in the current study; just two available 3D dense models have been tested. The conclusion can be deducted that models generated from images (camera and mobile) by pixelbased 3D reconstruction technology have almost the same accuracy and resolution and they can compete with the ScanArm model in many potential applications.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It does not mean that mobile images generally enable better models; the applied software has a great impact on the model attributes. There are studies (Somogyi et al, 2017, Barazzetti et al, 2010, Bianconi, et al, 2017 about the effect of combination of devices and software, this is not detailed in the current study; just two available 3D dense models have been tested. The conclusion can be deducted that models generated from images (camera and mobile) by pixelbased 3D reconstruction technology have almost the same accuracy and resolution and they can compete with the ScanArm model in many potential applications.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of the two photo based methods, point cloud and model could be created by reconstruction from multiple images technology using appropriate software, e.g. Agisoft Photoscan, Pix4D, Autodesk Remake and Visual SfM (Somogyi et al, 2017, Wikipedia, 2017, Jeon et al, 2017; for this study, Photoscan has been used for generating model from mobile pictures and Pix4D for the Camera model. Unscaled point clouds and models could be exported from these software, they must be scaled afterwards.…”
Section: Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the software calculation processes [10]- [12] are not explained, because the purpose was to give an overview and guidance for the architects about the photogrammetric survey process in general. Fig.…”
Section: Methodology and Process Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, development of data processing applications is also very important (e.g. [4], [5]), because to be able to use of data effectively, raw data has to be enriched to provide the user with a higher level of interactive possibilities.…”
Section: R Honti J Erdélyi a Kopáčikmentioning
confidence: 99%