2014
DOI: 10.15598/aeee.v12i2.975
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Standard and Fast Charging Methods for Electric Vehicles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Efficiency values at ambient temperature are around 90% and do not exceed 92% (Figure 3), slightly improving the fast charging efficiency of 89% reported in [8], which is lower compared to the standard AC charging efficiency evaluated around 95%. This is mainly due to energy losses with quadratic dependence on the charging current, especially losses on the battery and chokes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Efficiency values at ambient temperature are around 90% and do not exceed 92% (Figure 3), slightly improving the fast charging efficiency of 89% reported in [8], which is lower compared to the standard AC charging efficiency evaluated around 95%. This is mainly due to energy losses with quadratic dependence on the charging current, especially losses on the battery and chokes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Differences between charging systems, like nominal voltage, speed of charging, and plug type, are highlighted in [7], while in [8] standard and fast-charging methods for electric vehicles are compared. This comparison claims an increase of power losses during the fast charging process and underlines the possibility that a growing infrastructure of fast-charging stations could lead to inefficient management with electrical energy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The generated car usage profile was utilised in the forthcoming simulations. In this study, a typical AC charging efficiency of η b+ = 95% was assumed [44]. Furthermore, the same value was used as a discharging efficiency η b− -for the scenarios covering the V2G technology implementation.…”
Section: Modelling Of Electric Car Demandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirdly, electricity costs on a per-km basis are the same among all scenarios, results from the assumption that electricity costs per kWh and charging efficiency are homogeneous across all the BEV recharging modes. However in reality, the electricity costs for fast chargers may be higher than the others due to the lower charging efficiencies (i.e., higher losses) from fast charging and potential demand charges (Chlebis et al, 2014).…”
Section: Cost Breakdownmentioning
confidence: 99%