2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.11.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Standard-Dose and Reduced-Dose Expiratory MDCT Techniques for Assessment of Tracheomalacia in Children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1,4,5] Therefore, only a brief summary of MDCT technique is included in the following paragraphs in this section. All pediatric patients underwent MDCT studies using our department's standard paired inspiratory-expiratory MDCT airway protocol.…”
Section: Imaging Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1,4,5] Therefore, only a brief summary of MDCT technique is included in the following paragraphs in this section. All pediatric patients underwent MDCT studies using our department's standard paired inspiratory-expiratory MDCT airway protocol.…”
Section: Imaging Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies in children have shown that radiation exposure can be reduced by up to 23% while maintaining adequate diagnostic yield. 40 An additional challenge is the need for young children to participate in the methods required for MDCT techniques. This makes these techniques unfeasible in infants.…”
Section: E Diagnosis Of Tracheomalaciamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, the area with maximal collapse is based on measurements of the cross-sectional areas from the carina to the thoracic inlet. In a study by Lee et al, a radiologist determined the maximal collapse visually, while Ochs et al used a technique similar to ours that minimizes the interobserver variation [13,14]. An important problem with this method is that patients with only minor localized collapse are also included, and the impact of this is unknown and questionable [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%