2018
DOI: 10.17559/tv-20161221140914
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Static Aerodynamic Data Obtained in Dynamic Wind Tunnel Tests and Numerical Simulation Research

Abstract: Abstract:The aerodynamic data obtained in the static and dynamic wind tunnel tests are presented in this paper. The tests are performed in the T-38 wind tunnel facility of the Military Technical Institute in Belgrade. Normal force and pitching moment in static and dynamic tests are measured using semiconductor five-component strain gauge balance. This specific five-component balance is dynamic derivative balance. Forced oscillation technique is used for the dynamic measurements applied in the T-38 wind tunnel.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results were discussed in light of benchmarks between model predictions and experimental data (obtained from radar) and the results obtained from the semi-empiric ADK0 code (aerodynamic prediction code used in [5]).…”
Section: Verification Of the Theoretical Model 51 Cfd Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results were discussed in light of benchmarks between model predictions and experimental data (obtained from radar) and the results obtained from the semi-empiric ADK0 code (aerodynamic prediction code used in [5]).…”
Section: Verification Of the Theoretical Model 51 Cfd Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to estimate the drag coefficient of projectile's body, three turbulence models k-ω SST (The shear stress transport) (2 equations), transition k-kl-ω (3 equations) and Reynolds Stress Model RSM (5 equations), are used [3]. These models were tested and validated with the semi-empirical model (ADK0) using aerodynamic prediction used in [5]. Also these results were compared with experimental results obtained by 3D radar for all of projectile's types.…”
Section: Computational Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%