2006
DOI: 10.1504/ijef.2006.008837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of support-vector machines and back propagation neural networks in forecasting the six major Asian stock markets

Abstract: Recently, applying the novel data mining techniques for financial time-series forecasting has received much research attention. However, most researches are for the US and European markets, with only a few for Asian markets. This research applies Support-Vector Machines (SVMs) and Back Propagation (BP) neural networks for six Asian stock markets and our experimental results showed the superiority of both models, compared to the early researches.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
67
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data not present in Table 2 showed that the average return per trade is 0.06537% for the long trades and 0.2691% for short trades, which means that the OneR classifier was extremely profitable in downwards periods for this particular experiment. For the other classifiers, while prediction accuracies may be similar to those observed in the literature (Chen & Shih, 2006;Eng et al, 2008;Kim, 2003;Lee et al, 2007; S. Li & Kuo, 2008;Tenti, 1996), the average return per trade does not allow the models to have a positive return at the end of the trading period. These initial results suggest that it is possible to generate positive return with modest middle range accuracy.…”
Section: Single Training Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Data not present in Table 2 showed that the average return per trade is 0.06537% for the long trades and 0.2691% for short trades, which means that the OneR classifier was extremely profitable in downwards periods for this particular experiment. For the other classifiers, while prediction accuracies may be similar to those observed in the literature (Chen & Shih, 2006;Eng et al, 2008;Kim, 2003;Lee et al, 2007; S. Li & Kuo, 2008;Tenti, 1996), the average return per trade does not allow the models to have a positive return at the end of the trading period. These initial results suggest that it is possible to generate positive return with modest middle range accuracy.…”
Section: Single Training Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…On average, the SVM approach obtained better accuracy than the back propagation NN, but also in middle-range levels: 47.7% by SVM against 45.0% obtained by back propagation NN. SVM also outperformed a back propagation NN in the work presented by Chen and Shih (2006), where these techniques were used to predict the value of six Asian indices, obtaining 57.2% level of accuracy with SVM and 56.7% with NN models. In addition to simple models, Barbosa and Belo (2008b) also analysed the performance of SVM in the Forex market reporting cumulative accuracy 53.4% with a positive cumulative return of 56.0% trading a currency pair over a two year period.…”
Section: Accuracy Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The reported results indicated that augmented ANN models with trading volumes can improve forecasting performance in both medium-and long-term horizons. A comparison between SVM and Backpropagation (BP) ANN in forecasting six major Asian stock markets was reported in [22]. Other soft computing techniques such as Fuzzy Logic (FL) have been used to solve many stock market forecasting problems [23], [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%