2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.04.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of surgically induced astigmatism after coaxial phacoemulsification through 1.8 mm microincision and bimanual phacoemulsification through 1.7 mm microincision

Abstract: The amount of SIA induced by bimanual MICS and coaxial MICS phacoemulsification was very small. The bimanual MICS induced a slightly higher degree of SIA; however, according to all methods of SIA analysis, there was no significant difference in the mean SIA induced by both techniques.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
29
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
29
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Corneal incisions of 3.0 mm or more induce significant astigmatism (5,7,9,19). In the case of microincisional cataract surgeries with incisions smaller than 2.0 mm, one would think that no significant astigmatic effect is induced; however, it has been recently proved that such incisions induce 0.42-0.5 D astigmatism (20). Many publications confirm that superior incisions induce higher and indirect astigmatism, and that temporal incisions induce lower and direct astigmatism (7,(21)(22)(23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corneal incisions of 3.0 mm or more induce significant astigmatism (5,7,9,19). In the case of microincisional cataract surgeries with incisions smaller than 2.0 mm, one would think that no significant astigmatic effect is induced; however, it has been recently proved that such incisions induce 0.42-0.5 D astigmatism (20). Many publications confirm that superior incisions induce higher and indirect astigmatism, and that temporal incisions induce lower and direct astigmatism (7,(21)(22)(23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 In our study, the final SIA of 0.58 D for the 2.5 mm SICS group showed a result similar to that for the 2.0 mm MICS in the study by Hayashi et al 23 Wilczynski et al also compared the SIA 1 month after coaxial phacoemulsification through a 1.8 mm microincision with that for bimanual phacoemulsification through a 1.7 mm microincision. 17 The results showed a mean SIA of 0.42 AE 0.29 D for the coaxial MICS group and 0.50 AE 0.24 D for the bimanual group; the difference was not statistically significant. These studies revealed that limiting the incision size to < 2.5 mm will have less SIA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…17 Modern small-incision clear corneal cataract surgery causes less SIA and less change to corneal shape than older methods. 14,18 The main objective of our study was to compare the SIA caused by two different small incision sizes e 2.5 and 3.5 mm e for each individual.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of the biaxial MICS technique report SIA values of 0.36 D with 1.7 mm incisions, 12 0.15 D with 1.5 to 1.7 mm incisions, 22 and 0.23 D with 1.7 mm incisions. 23 These findings show that with even with small incisions, the SIA is almost zero when the proper technique and IOL are used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%