2011
DOI: 10.3923/jas.2011.1150.1156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Synthesis Techniques for Supported Iron Nanocatalysts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The synthesis method affects the morphology, catalyst particle size and surface area of the final catalyst to a large extent. Tasfy et al [84] indicated that, compared to precipitation method, the average particle size of the Fe particles supported on SiO 2 was smaller when the catalyst was prepared by the impregnation. In another work, Sarkari et al [85] indicated the effects of the preparation method on the catalytic activity of bimetallic Fe-Ni catalyst supported on alumina.…”
Section: Catalyst Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The synthesis method affects the morphology, catalyst particle size and surface area of the final catalyst to a large extent. Tasfy et al [84] indicated that, compared to precipitation method, the average particle size of the Fe particles supported on SiO 2 was smaller when the catalyst was prepared by the impregnation. In another work, Sarkari et al [85] indicated the effects of the preparation method on the catalytic activity of bimetallic Fe-Ni catalyst supported on alumina.…”
Section: Catalyst Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the strongly reducing conditions for catalysis, the resultant dark color during catalysis, and our kinetic observations, we asked the question, ‘Could the active species be a heterogeneous catalyst?’. The Fischer–Tropsch process , and the Haber–Bosch synthesis are the two most common examples of the use of iron in heterogeneous catalysis; however a limited number of other examples do exist as olefin hydrogenation catalysts. Iron nanoparticles are also catalysts for the formation of carbon nanotubes, the reduction of peroxides and CO 2 , and the hydrolytic dehydrogenation of ammonia boranes . Iron oxides have been used as nanoparticle supports for heterogeneous catalysis with other metals as the active sites, but the use of zerovalent iron as an active site for asymmetric catalysis has not been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This first H 2 consumption is typically related to the reduction of dispersed Fe 3+ to form Fe 2+ species. At temperatures centered near 700 °C more hydrogen is consumed which is typically related to the reduction of Fe 2+ to Fe o . Based on this TPR result, three samples were prepared by reduction with H 2 at 500, 800, and 900 °C for 2 h. Reduction at 500 °C turned the sample from brown to grey.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At temperatures centered near 700 ∘ C more hydrogen is consumed which is typically related to the reduction of Fe 2+ to Fe o . 40 Based on this TPR result, three samples were prepared by reduction with H 2 at 500, 800, and 900 ∘ C for 2 h. Reduction at 500 ∘ C turned the sample from brown to grey. The absence of apparent magnetism of the product obtained after reduction at 500 ∘ C suggests that most of the Fe 2+ was dispersed in the silica matrix or combined as Fe 2 SiO 4 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%