2008
DOI: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2007.12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Techniques Used for Removing the Recipient Stroma in Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty

Abstract: To compare 3 techniques used for removing the recipient stroma during anterior lamellar keratoplasty (ALK): the "big-bubble" technique, manual dissection using a crescent blade and slitlamp operating microscope, and microkeratome lamellar cut. Design: Retrospective comparative cohort study of 69 consecutive ALKs and 69 consecutive penetrating keratoplasties (PKs). Manifest refraction, slitlamp examination, Goldmann tonometry, ultrasound pachymetry, specular microscopy, and confocal microscopy findings were rec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
26
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
26
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…9 There is increased evidence that DALK could be a safer alternative to PK even without demonstrating better visual results 13,14 when executed adequately with deep dissection. 15 Finally, DALK would be more useful for preserving ocular structural integrity in the presence of trauma. 16,17 In addition, some authors have stated that the growing use of the lamellar technique could be beneficial in the long term, with cost savings due to the lower frequency of re-interventions and those related to the management of rejection, postoperative and intraocular complications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 There is increased evidence that DALK could be a safer alternative to PK even without demonstrating better visual results 13,14 when executed adequately with deep dissection. 15 Finally, DALK would be more useful for preserving ocular structural integrity in the presence of trauma. 16,17 In addition, some authors have stated that the growing use of the lamellar technique could be beneficial in the long term, with cost savings due to the lower frequency of re-interventions and those related to the management of rejection, postoperative and intraocular complications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,18 The incidence of DM perforation has been reported to be highly variable, ranging from 6% to 57%. 11,13,15,[19][20][21][22][23] The relatively high incidence of DM perforation in our series might result in poorer graft survival than with PKP. The high incidence of DM rupture may be attributable to the involvement of multiple surgeons, including some inexperienced surgeons.…”
Section: Dalk Versus Pkpmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…No significant difference, however, in astigmatic outcome between DALK and PK has been reported. 3,7 In a large retrospective case series reporting 229 PKs carried out for macular dystrophy, endothelial rejection episodes occurred in 20% of eyes, resulting in irreversible endothelial failure in 3.5% of eyes. The endothelial rejection accounted for nearly 35% of the failed corneal transplants in this series.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No cause for the age effect was evident, however. 7 Stromal dystrophies are known to recur within the donor material after corneal transplantation and therefore may require multiple grafts. The recurrence of macular dystrophy in patients who have undergone PK has been reported to be up to 25% in an average follow-up period of 7-22 years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%