2015
DOI: 10.12816/0024585
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Techniques Used in Isolation and Identification of Salmonella Spp. and Related Genera from Raw Meat and Abattoir Environment of Basrah

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using conventional PCR approach, 9 out of 36 of microbiologically Salmonella positive isolates were detected invA-positive in free range chicken which is in agreement with the results of previous studies suggested that PCR amplification of invA gene made a reliable rapid diagnosis of salmonella spp. in the samples compared with samples as evaluated by the traditional cultural and biochemical methods (El-Sharkawy et al, 2017;Siala et al, 2017) in pig, ruminant and chicken (Scholz et al, 2001;Al-Iedani et al, 2015;Akinola et al, 2019;Mkangara et al, 2020). In the present study, the overall rate of Salmonella isolates in the free-range chicken was significantly lower than that of the commercial raised chicken (Harvey et al, 2011;Jajere et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Using conventional PCR approach, 9 out of 36 of microbiologically Salmonella positive isolates were detected invA-positive in free range chicken which is in agreement with the results of previous studies suggested that PCR amplification of invA gene made a reliable rapid diagnosis of salmonella spp. in the samples compared with samples as evaluated by the traditional cultural and biochemical methods (El-Sharkawy et al, 2017;Siala et al, 2017) in pig, ruminant and chicken (Scholz et al, 2001;Al-Iedani et al, 2015;Akinola et al, 2019;Mkangara et al, 2020). In the present study, the overall rate of Salmonella isolates in the free-range chicken was significantly lower than that of the commercial raised chicken (Harvey et al, 2011;Jajere et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%