“…Furthermore, the SRES scenarios by themselves have often been adopted in most recent studies, even long after the release of the RCP scenarios, because the old scenarios were in accord with their objectives (e.g., Dunford et al, 2015;Jaczewski et al, 2015;Kiguchi et al, 2015;Kim et al, 2015;Casajus et al, 2016;Harrison et al, 2016;Mamoon et al, 2016;Stevanović et al, 2016;Tukimat and Alias, 2016;Zheng et al, 2016;Hassan et al, 2017;Park et al, 2017;da Silva et al, 2017). We employed the SRES marker scenarios because of their long-term consistency in assessing the impact of climate change on global and regional factors of socioeconomy and environment during the last decade -including air quality (Jacob and Winner, 2009;Carvalho et al, 2010), water quality and resources (Wilby et al, 2006;Shen et al, 2008Shen et al, , 2014Luo et al, 2013), energy (Hoogwijk et al, 2005;van Vliet et al, 2012), agriculture and forestry (Lavalle et al, 2009;Calzadilla et al, 2013;Stevanović et al, 2016;Zubizarreta-Gerendiain et al, 2016), fisheries (Barange et al, 2014;Lam et al, 2016), health and disease (Patz et al, 2005;Giorgi and Diffenbaugh, 2008;Ogden et al, 2014), climate and weather extremes (Déqué, 2007;Marengo et al, 2009;Jiang et al, 2012;Rummukainen, 2012), wildfires (Liu et al, 20...…”