2014
DOI: 10.1186/s40510-014-0057-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of temporomandibular joint changes in Twin Block and Bionator appliance therapy: a magnetic resonance imaging study

Abstract: BackgroundThe objective of the present study was to evaluate and compare temporomandibular joint changes especially disk-condyle-fossa relationship following functional treatment of skeletal class II division 1 malocclusion using Twin Block and Bionator appliances.MethodsThe total sample consisted of 30 subjects (13 males and 17 females) with class II division 1 malocclusion having mandibular retrognathism, in the age group of 9 to 14 years. Two treatment groups, i.e., Twin Block and Bionator groups, were form… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
28
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
6
28
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings agree with those of Chintakanon et al (19) and Chavan et al (16). The latter conducted a controlled study using magnetic resonance and observed a more forward condyle position, although they recommended long-term follow-up to investigate the stability of their findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…These findings agree with those of Chintakanon et al (19) and Chavan et al (16). The latter conducted a controlled study using magnetic resonance and observed a more forward condyle position, although they recommended long-term follow-up to investigate the stability of their findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Some of these studies showed a significant relation in changes of condyle position after orthodontic treatment. 16,21,28 For the mean difference in Condylion to TC line before and after orthodontic treatment, Angle class I type 1 is 9.8%, Angle class I type 2 is 11.9%, Angle class I type 3 is 9.3%, Angle class I type 4 is 9.2% and for Angle class I type 5 is 8.2%. The p-value of this five groups of sample were less than 0.05 which showed that that was a statistically significant effect observed in the condylar osition for five types of Angle class I malocclusion before and after orthodontic treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twin-blok ve Bionator apareylerini birbirleri ve kontrol grubuyla karşılaştır-dıkları 30 hastada yaptıkları araştırmalarında kondil, disk ve fossa ilişkisini manyetik rezonans görüntüleme ile değerlendirmişlerdir. 29 Tedavi so-nunda anterior pozisyonda konumlanan kondil ve posterior pozisyonda konumlanan diskin uzun dö-nemde normal konumlarına geri döndüğünü belirtmişlerdir.…”
Section: Tme Etki̇leri̇unclassified