2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10040-016-1471-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the AVI, modified SINTACS and GALDIT vulnerability methods under future climate-change scenarios for a shallow low-lying coastal aquifer in southern Finland

Abstract: A shallow unconfined low-lying coastal aquifer in southern Finland surrounded by the Baltic Sea is vulnerable to changes in groundwater recharge, sea-level rise and human activities. Assessment of the intrinsic vulnerability of groundwater under climate scenarios was performed for the aquifer area by utilising the results of a published study on the impacts of climate change on groundwater recharge and sea-level rise on groundwater-seawater interaction. Three intrinsic vulnerability mapping methods, the aquife… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The parameters used are the groundwater occurrence (G), aquifer hydraulic conductivity (A), height of the groundwater level above sea level (L), distance inland perpendicular from the shoreline (D), impact of existing seawater intrusion in the area (I), and thickness of the aquifer considered (T). Many studies have employed the GALDIT method to assess the overall vulnerability of coastal aquifers to SWI in coastal regions and islands of different countries in Europe, Asia, and Africa over very small (2 km 2 ) and large (2835 km 2 ) areas [4,[22][23][24][25][26][27].Lobo-Ferreira and Chachadi [21,22] used GALDIT to conduct vulnerability tests on an unconfined aquifer covering an area of approximately 10 km 2 at Monte Gordo, Portugal. They mapped the spatial distributions of the six GALDIT parameters and prepared SWI scenarios describing sea level rises of 0.25 and 0.5 m and applied them to the parameter G to calculate the vulnerability depending on individual scenarios.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameters used are the groundwater occurrence (G), aquifer hydraulic conductivity (A), height of the groundwater level above sea level (L), distance inland perpendicular from the shoreline (D), impact of existing seawater intrusion in the area (I), and thickness of the aquifer considered (T). Many studies have employed the GALDIT method to assess the overall vulnerability of coastal aquifers to SWI in coastal regions and islands of different countries in Europe, Asia, and Africa over very small (2 km 2 ) and large (2835 km 2 ) areas [4,[22][23][24][25][26][27].Lobo-Ferreira and Chachadi [21,22] used GALDIT to conduct vulnerability tests on an unconfined aquifer covering an area of approximately 10 km 2 at Monte Gordo, Portugal. They mapped the spatial distributions of the six GALDIT parameters and prepared SWI scenarios describing sea level rises of 0.25 and 0.5 m and applied them to the parameter G to calculate the vulnerability depending on individual scenarios.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers have analyzed sensitivity using the map removal method to determine the importance of layers in the SINTACS model, then remove the least important layer, and add other layers such as land use or fault [16,27,[35][36][37].…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysis Of Sintacs Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is believed that in this case, the effect of errors and uncertainties of a parameter is limited in the final output. Many previous researchers used this index to estimate vulnerability [16][17][18][19]. In the next step, arsenic and nitrate concentrations in groundwater were combined with the layers of groundwater recharge potential model, and an occurrence probability map was prepared.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vulnerability of coastal aquifers is an intrinsic feature of them that relates to the geological structure, topography, and dynamics of groundwater flow [6]; and as fresh and salt water are miscible, there is a transition zone where these waters are gradually mixed by diffusion processes. The degree of groundwater vulnerability is affected by seasonal variations in groundwater recharge during the year [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%