2001
DOI: 10.1159/000052413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Clinical Validity of Free Prostate–Specific Antigen, Alpha–1 Antichymotrypsin–Bound Prostate–Specific Antigen and Complexed Prostate–Specific Antigen in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some workers have compared the ratio of free to total PSA or free to complexed PSA. [3,4] Others have used plasma lipid levels, [5,6] vitamin E (α and γ tocopherol), [7] trace metal-Selenium, [8] and serum to urinary PSA ratio. [9,10] These previous studies have produced varying outcomes with merits and shortcomings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some workers have compared the ratio of free to total PSA or free to complexed PSA. [3,4] Others have used plasma lipid levels, [5,6] vitamin E (α and γ tocopherol), [7] trace metal-Selenium, [8] and serum to urinary PSA ratio. [9,10] These previous studies have produced varying outcomes with merits and shortcomings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test is a two-step sandwich assay based on the biotin-streptavidin technology and uses a peroxidase-labeled antibody specific against PSA-ACT. 20 The analytical characteristics of these assays (precision, detection limit, recovery, interferences) corresponded to data previously described in detail. 20,22 During this study, the inter-assay precisions for all assays were controlled with control materials in the low PSA range (tPSA: 0.79, 2.70, 3.34 g/l; cPSA: 3.31 g/l; PSA-ACT: 2.51 g/l; fPSA: 0.99 g/l) and showed variation coefficients between 1.8 and 4.5%.…”
Section: Determination Of Psamentioning
confidence: 67%
“…19 A novel PSA assay introduced by Bayer that measures all the complexed PSA (cPSA) except PSA complexed with ␣ 2 -macroglobulin and a prototype PSA-ACT assay have eliminated the technical obstacles to reliable measurement of these PSA forms. 18,20 These new assays for determining complexed PSA forms and the assay for fPSA were used in this study to gain further insights Abbreviations: ACT, ␣ 1 -antichymotrypsin; BPH, benign prostatic hyperplasia; cPSA, complexed form of PSA; fPSA, free, noncomplexed form of PSA; PCa, prostate cancer; PSA, prostate-specific antigen; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; tPSA, total PSA, both free and complexed forms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,17 However, other studies using more equal tPSA distributions in patients with BPH and prostate cancer could only show a slightly better diagnostic performance of cPSA alone compared with tPSA. 36,38,39 Only the cPSA/tPSA ratio could reach specificity levels comparable to %fPSA. 18,40 The preliminary data of a cPSA multicenter study has revealed a better performance of the cPSA/tPSA ratio in the 4 to 10 ng/mL tPSA range compared with cPSA alone, but in the lower range of 2 to 6 ng/mL, cPSA outperformed the cPSA/tPSA ratio.…”
Section: Psa-act and Cpsamentioning
confidence: 97%