2022
DOI: 10.1177/09544119221102704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the design maps of TPMS based bone scaffolds using a computational modeling framework simultaneously considering various conditions

Abstract: In recent years, the triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS)-based scaffolds have been served as one of the crucial types of structures for biological replacements, the energy absorber, etc. Meanwhile, the development of additive manufacturing (AM) has facilitated the production of TPMS scaffolds with complex microstructures. However, the design maps of TPMS scaffolds, especially considering the AM constraints, remain unclear, which has hindered the design and application of TPMS scaffolds. The aims of the pres… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The stress distribution under compression is shown in Figure 10 . The proposed supporting reaction force can be obtained through formula calculation ( Feng et al, 2021 ; Lu et al, 2022 ), and the partial stiffness matrix of the structure was compared with the target value. The comparison between the results and the target value is as shown in Figure 11 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The stress distribution under compression is shown in Figure 10 . The proposed supporting reaction force can be obtained through formula calculation ( Feng et al, 2021 ; Lu et al, 2022 ), and the partial stiffness matrix of the structure was compared with the target value. The comparison between the results and the target value is as shown in Figure 11 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FE method was used to calculate the equivalent stiffness matrix of the human bone from computed tomography (CT) images ( Figure 3 ). The 2D image is re-established as a 3D model by superposition, and then the finite element method is utilized to solve the , with 1,2,3 in the parameters corresponding to the x , y , and z directions, respectively, as detailed in the literature ( Xiao et al, 2021 ; Lu et al, 2022 ). The stiffness matrix was then compared with those in the existing literature to verify its rationality ( Kalouche et al, 2010 ; Wang et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FE method was used to calculate the equivalent stiffness matrix of the human bone from computed tomography (CT) images (Figure 3). The 2D image is re-established as a 3D model by superposition, and then the finite element method is utilized to solve the C ij , with 1,2,3 in the parameters corresponding to the x, y, and z directions, respectively, as detailed in the literature Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology frontiersin.org (Xiao et al, 2021;Lu et al, 2022). The stiffness matrix was then compared with those in the existing literature to verify its rationality (Kalouche et al, 2010;Wang et al, 2016).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because the preparation process has not yet reached the ideal requirements, which requires us to continuously improve the technology and overcome the process limits of 3D printing. 72 , 76 , 100 102 …”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%