Summary
Comparative studies on the immunostimulating (paramunizing) effectiveness of BCG, levamisole, Corynebacterium parvum and preparations of pock viruses in various in vitro and in vivo tests
There are 3 classical immunostimulants: BCG, levamisole and C. parvum. For some years in veterinary medicine two immunostimulants from pock or parapock viruses have been employed as paramunity inducers with success (PIND‐AVI, PIND‐ORF). In order to explore in detail the functional bases of the above preparations, they were compared by the following tests: 1. In 2 infection models (vesicular stomatitis and Aujesky virus; 2. In a tumour model (radiation induced osteosarcoma in the mouse); 3. The chromium 51 test to demonstrate spontaneous (natural) cytotoxicity; 4. An indirect plaque reduction test to detect stimulation from interferon; and 5. The lymphocyte transformation test.
The results showed that the effect of the individual immunostimulants can vary very widely. Both paramunity inducers were effective in all the 5 tests and were harmless. PIND‐AVI, however, activated above all the lymphocyte, whereas PIND‐ORF had NK (natural mouse spleen killer cells) activity and was the only one of the 5 immunostimulants which also stimulated interferon production. C. parvum, BCG and levamisole were significantly less effective and they were also pyrogenic and in some cases also toxic. The main point arising from the study is that when using immunostimulants it is essential to know precisely how they act and also the damaging effects of the individual agents if the desired effects are to be achieved without harm to the patients. The 5 test systems which we used seem to be the ones of choice for the purpose. Special attention is directed to preparations of pock viruses which act as harmless but effective immunostimulants.
Zusammenfassung
Es gibt drei klassische Immunstimulantien: BCG, Levamisol und C. parvum. In der Tiermedizin werden seit Jahren 2 Immunstimulantien, die aus Pocken‐ bzw. Parapockenviren hergestellt werden, als sog. Paramunitätsinducer mit Erfolg verwendet (PIND‐AVI, PIND‐ORF). Um die funktionellen Grundlagen obiger Präparate detailliert erfassen zu können, sind sie in folgenden Testen vergleichend untersucht worden: 1. in 2 Infektionsmodellen (Stomatitis vesicularis‐, Aujeszky‐Virus), 2. in einem Tumormodell (strahleninduziertes Osteosarkom der Maus), 3. im Chromium 51‐Test zum Nachweis der spontanen, natürlichen Zytotoxizität, 4. im indirekten Plaque‐Reduktions‐Test zum Nachweis der Stimulierung von Interferon und 5. im Lymphozyten‐Transformationstest.
Die Untersuchungsergebnisse weisen darauf hin, daß die Wirkung der einzelnen Immunstimulantien sehr unterschiedlich sein kann. Die beiden Paramunitätsinducer waren in allen Testen wirksam und unschädlich. Trotzdem unterschieden sie sich. PIND‐AVI aktivierte vor allem die Lymphozyten, während PIND‐ORF besonders die NK‐Aktivität und, als einziges der 5 Präparate, auch die Interferonbildung stimulierte. C. parvum, BCG und Levamisol schnitten wesentlich schlechter ab, w...