2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:bien.0000042105.69701.4c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Efficacy and Noise Immunity of Algorithms for Recognition of Shockable Cardiac Rhythms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to note that for the original ECG signals obtained, it is necessary to perform an initial pre-processing (filtering, noise elimination, scaling, etc.) to be able to proceed in the next stages of characterization of them [6,7]. Once the signals were obtained, we proceeded to the construction of filters and pre-processing them (elimination of noise, etc.…”
Section: Data Base Of Ecg Signalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that for the original ECG signals obtained, it is necessary to perform an initial pre-processing (filtering, noise elimination, scaling, etc.) to be able to proceed in the next stages of characterization of them [6,7]. Once the signals were obtained, we proceeded to the construction of filters and pre-processing them (elimination of noise, etc.…”
Section: Data Base Of Ecg Signalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
Various algorithms are used for automatic fibrillation detection [1,2]. Each algorithm has specific advantages and disadvantages.
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%