2001
DOI: 10.1128/iai.69.4.2198-2210.2001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of theexoSGene and Protein Expression in Soil and Clinical Isolates ofPseudomonas aeruginosa

Abstract: Exoenzyme S (ExoS) is translocated into eukaryotic cells by the type III secretory process and has been hypothesized to function in conjunction with other virulence factors in the pathogenesis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. To gain further understanding of how ExoS might contribute to P. aeruginosa survival and virulence, ExoS expression and the structural gene sequence were determined in P. aeruginosa soil isolates and compared with ExoS of clinical isolates. Significantly higher levels of ExoS ADP-ribosyltransfe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prevalence of exoS was highest in CF pulmonary isolates (94 %; Table 3), in agreement with previous studies (Dacheux et al, 2000;Feltman et al, 2001). The prevalence of exoS was similar in isolates from plants (90 %; Table 3) and from soil isolates (Ferguson et al, 2001). Nevertheless, 80 % of all pulmonary isolates harboured exoS, indicating that this gene plays a major role in all pulmonary infections.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The prevalence of exoS was highest in CF pulmonary isolates (94 %; Table 3), in agreement with previous studies (Dacheux et al, 2000;Feltman et al, 2001). The prevalence of exoS was similar in isolates from plants (90 %; Table 3) and from soil isolates (Ferguson et al, 2001). Nevertheless, 80 % of all pulmonary isolates harboured exoS, indicating that this gene plays a major role in all pulmonary infections.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The entire gene sequence was reconstructed from these data by using DNA analysis software. The sequences of strains previously published in GenBank were used for the evaluation of exoS (10,35). These included the following strains (accession number): 388 (L27629), PAK (AYO29248), CCU1 (AYO29240), CCU2 (AYO29241), CCU3 (AYO29252), CCU4 (AYO29243), CCU5 (AYO29246), CCU6 (AYO29250), CCU8 (AYO29249), CCU9 (AYO29239), DG1 (AYO29247), FRD1 (AYO29251), PA-U1 (AYO29245), PA-U3 (AYO29242), and ATCC 27853 (AYO29244).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To analyse substrate modification in the cytosolic and membrane fractions, a 50 ml aliquot of each sample was mixed with 46 Laemmli sample buffer and an equivalent volume of each fraction was resolved by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted for RalA, Rab proteins, or Rac1, as described above. ExoS ADPRT activity in remaining portions of cytosolic and membrane fractions was quantified, as described previously (Ferguson et al, 2001), and related to total protein concentrations in the respective sample determined using the Sigma Diagnostics Lowry-based protein assay. Data were analysed for statistical significance using one-way factorial ANOVA, as described above.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%