2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-15740-1_171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Key Structures Between RV Reducer and Spinea Reducer Based on Finite Element Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…. ., M n−2 max , M n−1 max determined from expression (17) or (19) with the value of torque M K , the effective number of rollers m is determined. The algorithm for determining the effective number of rollers m transferring torque M K is shown in Figure 4.…”
Section: Effective Number Of Rollersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…. ., M n−2 max , M n−1 max determined from expression (17) or (19) with the value of torque M K , the effective number of rollers m is determined. The algorithm for determining the effective number of rollers m transferring torque M K is shown in Figure 4.…”
Section: Effective Number Of Rollersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proceeding as in the first stage, the distribution of forces Fj(β) (22), the distribution of contact pressures pj(β) (23) and (24), and the distribution of mechanical power losses PC (43) were determined, while the number of rollers m carrying the torque MK and the angle βk m by which the sliding plate must rotate to balance the torque MK were determined from the algorithm in Figure 4 and expressions (19) and (20). The results of the calculations are summarized in Figure 13.…”
Section: Total Mechanical Losses Pcmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations