2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2018.01.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the main dating methods for six ball-point pen inks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
15
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
15
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The last group is called dynamic dating methods, because they specify changes in the concentration of one or more components of the inks over time. [ 7 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The last group is called dynamic dating methods, because they specify changes in the concentration of one or more components of the inks over time. [ 7 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6] The study of the ink, namely, its differentiation and dating, is one of the most appealing challenges of forensic studies. About 28 methods of dating ink [2,[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] have been proposed since 1984. Several factors are involved in ink ageing, and the proposed models have only taken into account some of them [13] ; moreover, the models have several limitations and work properly for only few types of inks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While this is still destructive, the use of optical methods can better ensure the integrity of the documents. The modern evidence identification requirements ensure the integrity of the questioned documents, so the optical analysis methods that are nondestructive examination for the questioned documents are obviously more in line with the requirements of the current forensic examination for physical evidence .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%