2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2013.05.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the plaque assay and 50% tissue culture infectious dose assay as methods for measuring filovirus infectivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
76
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
76
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This assay was selected because of its higher sensitivity and cost-effectiveness compared with plaque assay [17,18]. Virus liquid was sequentially diluted by minimum essential medium (MEM) in gradient dilutions from 10 −1 to 10 −10 and then cultured in 96-well culture plates (8 × 12 wells).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assay was selected because of its higher sensitivity and cost-effectiveness compared with plaque assay [17,18]. Virus liquid was sequentially diluted by minimum essential medium (MEM) in gradient dilutions from 10 −1 to 10 −10 and then cultured in 96-well culture plates (8 × 12 wells).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The antiviral activity of WPOS, FOS and LOS extract were studied in the context of three main treatments which are post-, pre-and virucidal effect using plaque reduction assay. Plaque reduction assay is a quantitative measurement of the number of plaques that are formed by a virus at various dilutions (Smither et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One issue to take note of in animal model development of filovirus infection is the impact of particle to plaque-forming unit (PFU) ratios on lethality, wherein it is possible that increasing the dose could actually decrease infectivity due to an immunogenic effect produced by inactive virions in the stock. Additionally, the plaque assay used to measure live virions in a stock may greatly underestimate the true quantity of infectious virions in a preparation (Alfson et al, 2015;smither et al, 2013a).…”
Section: Filovirusesmentioning
confidence: 99%