2023
DOI: 10.14744/anatoljcardiol.2023.2927
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Relationship Between Inflammatory Markers and Atrial Fibrillation Burden

Abstract: Background: Atrial fibrillation is a complex disease with irregular ventricular response and tachycardia as a result of irregular and rapid contraction of the atria, with poor cardiovascular outcomes unless treated. Various mechanisms are involved in its pathophysiology. .Inflammation has an important place among these mechanisms. Many cardiovascular events accompany inflammation. Understanding and correct evaluation of inflammation in current situations contribute to the diagnosis and severity of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the recent study MPV can be an early predictor of LV hypertrophy development [14]. PLR is the known systemic inflammatory marker, that is associated with AF paroxysm and progression [15]. It is also an independent predictor of thrombogenesis, and closely corelates with LA strain and remodeling [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the recent study MPV can be an early predictor of LV hypertrophy development [14]. PLR is the known systemic inflammatory marker, that is associated with AF paroxysm and progression [15]. It is also an independent predictor of thrombogenesis, and closely corelates with LA strain and remodeling [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results differ from those of a recent study indicating that the PLR was increased and platelet numbers were reduced in patients with permanent AF compared with those in patients with paroxysmal AF. 18 Discrepancies in AF severity may explain the differences between the studies. In addition, we utilized APPLE and CHA2DS2-VASc scores as positive controls to highlight the characteristic differences between paroxysmal and nonparoxysmal AF and to exclude the effect of patient selection bias on the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%