2020
DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/202022504008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Responses of New Reduced-Size Calorimetric Cells Made of Different Structure Materials for High Energy Deposition

Abstract: This paper concerns experimental and numerical works on a new differential calorimeter called CALORRE and validated recently under irradiation conditions in MARIA reactor at low nuclear absorbed dose rate level. Works focus on a specific configuration of CALORRE which was designed especially for the measurement of high nuclear energy deposition rates inside Material Testing Reactors. Due to the high level, a new calibration system was fabricated in order to determine the response of the new configuration under… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, a reducedheight configuration is suited for higher values of nuclear heating rate compared to a full-height configuration. This reduction in sensitivity under real conditions was confirmed by a validated predicted model based on a heat balance [19][20]. For example, the configuration N°1, had a sensitivity of 88.9 °C.g.W -1 as against 49.6 °C.g.W -1 for the In addition, the aluminum configurations are suited to highest nuclear absorbed dose rate measurement [19][20] due to the low sensitivities.…”
Section: Parametrical Study Under Laboratorymentioning
confidence: 69%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Consequently, a reducedheight configuration is suited for higher values of nuclear heating rate compared to a full-height configuration. This reduction in sensitivity under real conditions was confirmed by a validated predicted model based on a heat balance [19][20]. For example, the configuration N°1, had a sensitivity of 88.9 °C.g.W -1 as against 49.6 °C.g.W -1 for the In addition, the aluminum configurations are suited to highest nuclear absorbed dose rate measurement [19][20] due to the low sensitivities.…”
Section: Parametrical Study Under Laboratorymentioning
confidence: 69%
“…More precisely, the full-height and half-surface aluminum configuration (configuration N°3) was qualified under laboratory conditions up to 60 W thanks to a new heating element system. This very large calibration range allowed the demonstration of the good running of the calorimetric cell for the maximal value of the nuclear absorbed dose rate inside the future JHR (20 W.g -1 ) [19][20].…”
Section: Parametrical Study Under Laboratorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This calorimeter was designed and developed by the Polish National Center of Nuclear Research (NCBJ) to carry out experiments in the MARIA Reactor in 2014 and 2015. The aim of these two irradiation campaigns was the comparison of different calorimeters: KAROLINA calorimeter and gamma thermometer then KAROLINA calorimeter and two French differential calorimeters (CARMEN [5] and CALORRE [12,13]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%