2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2007.10.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the use of morphological, protein and DNA markers in the genetic characterization of Iranian wild Prunus species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
22
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
5
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result was expected since almond is an outbreeder and spontaneous hybridization is known to occur among species (Serafinov 1971;Denisov 1988). This high phenotypic variability agree with previous reports in the molecular characterization using different markers as nuclear and chloroplast Simple sequence repeats (SSRs) Zeinalabedini et al 2008) or Amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs) (Sorkheh et al 2007).…”
Section: Diversity Indices Principal Component Analysis and Correlatsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This result was expected since almond is an outbreeder and spontaneous hybridization is known to occur among species (Serafinov 1971;Denisov 1988). This high phenotypic variability agree with previous reports in the molecular characterization using different markers as nuclear and chloroplast Simple sequence repeats (SSRs) Zeinalabedini et al 2008) or Amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs) (Sorkheh et al 2007).…”
Section: Diversity Indices Principal Component Analysis and Correlatsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Morphological characters were used in phenotypic observations to characterize the genetic diversity of almond species, but their interactions with the environment and the small number of characters [20][21][22] prompted the use of other more discriminating techniques. Currently, DNA markers are widely used in studies of genetic diversity and the clarification of certain research questions, among others, those concerning their genetic origin [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This tendency has nothing to do with the known dissemination routes of almonds from Central Asia to the Mediterranean, which could be explained by the discrepancies described above. However, genetic relationships calculated from the proportion of shared alleles gave a good reflection of the closer genetic relationships between Spanish, French, Italian and Iranian cultivars in comparison with Ukrainian, Slovakian and Czech cultivars (Zeinalabedini et al, 2008). Distinct clustering was also apparent for Portuguese and Tunisian cultivars.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Nevertheless, the utilization of isoenzyme detection is limited by the small 382 number of loci that can be analysed with relatively simple enzyme staining methods, as well as the low levels of allelic variation at most loci. Interestingly, as a biochemical parameter the total protein content seemed to be accurately correlated with the taxonomical relationships between various wild relatives of almond (Zeinalabedini et al, 2008).…”
Section: Isoenzyme Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%