2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-009-1553-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of three different iodine-based bowel regimens for CT colonography

Abstract: Considering preparation quality alone, GFPH was the best regimen, but SD provided the best balance between bowel preparation quality and patient acceptability.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
25
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This demonstrates that, as an MRI-based technique, MRA also has a disadvantage in its ability to exclude acute PE, which may be the mainly factor responsible for the inadequate sensitivity of the diagnosis of acute PE using MRI. Cur rently, the intravenous contrast agents used in CT angiography are usually non-ionic iodine-based substances [24]. However, there have been many adverse reactions caused by iodine-based contrast agents, including acute adverse reactions (cardiovascular collapse, laryngeal edema, convulsions and arrhythmias) and late adverse reactions (late skin reactions), some of which may have fatal outcomes [25,26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This demonstrates that, as an MRI-based technique, MRA also has a disadvantage in its ability to exclude acute PE, which may be the mainly factor responsible for the inadequate sensitivity of the diagnosis of acute PE using MRI. Cur rently, the intravenous contrast agents used in CT angiography are usually non-ionic iodine-based substances [24]. However, there have been many adverse reactions caused by iodine-based contrast agents, including acute adverse reactions (cardiovascular collapse, laryngeal edema, convulsions and arrhythmias) and late adverse reactions (late skin reactions), some of which may have fatal outcomes [25,26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Campanella et al [9] described results of CTC in three different groups: (1) high-dose phopha soda with 100 ml of Gastrografin over 2 days, (2) a mild ''laxative'' (macrogol) with 50 ml of Gastrografin 2 h before the exam and (3) 2 ml kg 21 Gastrografin over 2 days without laxatives. All patients were asked to comply with a lowfibre diet for 2 days before the exam, and to fast on the day.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter is the original CT colonography technique used with high-dose laxatives [10,11], essentially transferred from barium enema bowel preparation. A low-fibre diet can be successfully used with faecal tagging [12][13][14][15]. If the diet is not modified, then whichever faecal tagging regimen is used would be expected to result in some untagged faecal material due to the presence of macroscopic fibrous plant residue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%