Comparison of three mapping procedures developed for river macrophytes

Abstract

Three methods of mapping macrophytes on short sections of river are described and compared. All methods involve setting up a l-m grid system over the site using permanent stakes to locate a series of temporary strings. The first method (detailed mapping), which generates a map. uses the grid system to locate accurately the position of macrophytes and substrata on the river bed. It is very time consuming and objectivity in mapping is difficult to achieve. The second method (points method) involves recording the macrophytes and substratum below each Intersection of the I-m grid system covering the study site. This method is fast, capable of giving estimates of percentage cover for the different substrata and macrophytes but does not produce a map. The third method (rectangles method) is regarded as both the most efficient and also the most objective of the three mapping procedures. The substratum or macrophyte dominating each 50 X 100 cm rectangle of river bed is recorded together with additional substrata and macrophytes present. The procedure is rapid to use in the field, provides a simplified map of the study site and is more amenable to detailed analysis than the two previous methods. All three mapping methods are best suited to rivers less than 20 m wide where safe wading and good visibility can be guaranteed.

Measuring submerged macrophyte standing crop in shallow rivers: A test of methodology

“…In this study the removed material as a proportion of the macrophyte biomass in a reach was negligible; even where macrophyte biomass was lowest (Maiden Newton, March) sampling-related destruction accounted for < 1.4 % of biomass within a 10 m reach. Wright et al (1981) concluded that repeated monthly sampling of chalk river macrophytes (area = 0.05 m 2 , n = 25 per month), using a similar method to this study, did not affect subsequent measures of abundance. Therefore, repeated sampling may not affect future macrophyte abundance, when both the sampler size and sample number are small.…”

Modelling flow resistance in vegetated streams: review and development of new theory

“…Finally, there is a volumetric version of the blockage factor, which relates the volume occupied by the plants to the volume of the chosen reach of channel. Fisher (1992) related both the volumetric blockage factor and the surface area blockage factor to Manning's n. Since Fisher concluded that it was actually easier to measure the surface area ratio (for mapping techniques of aquatic macrophytes, see Wright et al (1981)), she proposed that this method should be used. The best-fit relationship of this type was…”

Macrophyte communities of European streams with altered physical habitat

“…This issue should be investigated in more detail, e.g. by applying the 'rectangle method' described by (Wright et al, 1981).…”