1991
DOI: 10.1016/0041-008x(91)90291-l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of three physiologically based pharmacokinetic models of benzene disposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the longer term, it would be exciting to couple the present work with pharmacokinetic modeling of the transport, transformation, and fates of key chemical constituents within the body. Such methods are presently being applied to inhalation exposure to gaseous pollutants, such as benzene (Bois et al, 1991) and hold considerable promise for improving our understanding of the health effects of air pollutants.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the longer term, it would be exciting to couple the present work with pharmacokinetic modeling of the transport, transformation, and fates of key chemical constituents within the body. Such methods are presently being applied to inhalation exposure to gaseous pollutants, such as benzene (Bois et al, 1991) and hold considerable promise for improving our understanding of the health effects of air pollutants.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MC method is based on a reconstruction of the prior probability distributions of the parameters involved and produces the probability distribution of the scaled in vivo clearance, which includes a description of the parameter variability. This approach, although widely used in other pharmacokinetic modeling areas (Farrar et al, 1989;Hattis et al, 1990;Bois et al, 1991;Gearhart et al, 1993;Krewski et al, 1995), has several major drawbacks when applied to in vitro-in vivo clearance predictions. Reconstructing a prior statistical distribution from (as a rule) a small sample can often introduce a dmd.aspetjournals.org significant bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The usual procedure for incorporating measures of variability and uncertainty into pharmacokinetic modeling is Monte Carlo (MC 1 ) simulation (Farrar et al, 1989;Bois et al, 1991;Hattis et al, 1990;Gearhart et al, 1993;Krewski et al, 1995). The core of this procedure is the specification of prior model parameter probability distribution functions (pdfs).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of the field studies illustrated the utility of monitoring workers for exposures at numerous times throughout the day, particularly when jobspecific tasks may indicate a potential for exposure (121 ). Although PBPK models are powerful and have many successful applications, they require knowledge of a much larger number of variables, some of which are difficult to obtain quantitative information (122 ).…”
Section: Assessment Of Exposure To Vocsmentioning
confidence: 99%