2016
DOI: 10.1155/2016/7463963
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Three Statistical Downscaling Methods and Ensemble Downscaling Method Based on Bayesian Model Averaging in Upper Hanjiang River Basin, China

Abstract: Many downscaling techniques have been developed in the past few years for projection of station-scale hydrological variables from large-scale atmospheric variables to assess the hydrological impacts of climate change. To improve the simulation accuracy of downscaling methods, the Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) method combined with three statistical downscaling methods, which are support vector machine (SVM), BCC/RCG-Weather Generators (BCC/RCG-WG), and Statistics Downscaling Model (SDSM), is proposed in this s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this aim, various downscaling methods have been developed, which are mainly categorized into two types: dynamic and statistical. The latter is more common in climate change projection studies due to its ease and low cost compared with the dynamic downscaling methods (Hassan et al ., ; Liu et al ., ). This study focuses on one of the most widely used downscaling methods, which is called the statistical downscaling method or statistical downscaling model (SDSM), as a regression‐based technique (Wilby and Dawson, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For this aim, various downscaling methods have been developed, which are mainly categorized into two types: dynamic and statistical. The latter is more common in climate change projection studies due to its ease and low cost compared with the dynamic downscaling methods (Hassan et al ., ; Liu et al ., ). This study focuses on one of the most widely used downscaling methods, which is called the statistical downscaling method or statistical downscaling model (SDSM), as a regression‐based technique (Wilby and Dawson, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The exclusion of influential predictors from a downscaling model can cause it to perform poorly, as important large‐scale atmospheric information may be missing in the inputs. Also, the inclusion of non‐influential predictors or inclusion of predictors which have no significant impact on a predictand can ingest noise into the model (Liu et al, ) and ultimately lead to its poor performance. Furthermore, the redundant information in the predictors can yield unnecessarily complex models which can increase the computational cost (May et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method is capable of correcting systematic errors in GCMs' output with less computational complexity and a higher feasibility [20]. There are several statistical downscaling methods, and the availability of these methods varies between different regions [21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%