2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2017.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of total and aqua regia extractability of heavy metals in sewage sludge: The case study of a certified reference material

Abstract: A number of different digestion methods, including aqua regia extraction following two ISO guides were used in an inter-laboratory comparison study. The results obtained showed comparable values for the total and aqua regia extractable content of As, Cu, Fe, Hg, Pb and Zn, while Cd, Co and Cr results were about 10% lower when aqua regia was employed. This small difference was covered by the between-laboratory relative standard deviation of the measurements; therefore in this study no difference in the extracti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(23 reference statements)
1
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Variation between the methods is considered negligible compared to the variation between the XRF and the analytical results. Methods 1 [39] and 2 [40] measure real total elemental concentrations, whereas the aqua regia digestion used in method 3 [41] does not dissolve silicates, iron oxides and associated metals [42]. As such, the complete removal of some elements from the soil exchange complex is prohibited.…”
Section: Laboratory Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variation between the methods is considered negligible compared to the variation between the XRF and the analytical results. Methods 1 [39] and 2 [40] measure real total elemental concentrations, whereas the aqua regia digestion used in method 3 [41] does not dissolve silicates, iron oxides and associated metals [42]. As such, the complete removal of some elements from the soil exchange complex is prohibited.…”
Section: Laboratory Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A subsample of sediments (about 10 g) was sent to a commercial laboratory where the total metal content was determined after extraction with aqua regia and using an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS). The amount of metal extracted using aqua regia is, in most cases, comparable (in the case of Zn and Pb) or slightly less (in the case of Cd) than the amount extracted by the hydrogen fluoride (HF) acid mixture [26,27]. Therefore, although comparisons of the metal content obtained by these two methods can be made, a distinction is in order, usually by denominating the metal extracted by aqua regia as the pseudo-total metal content.…”
Section: Sampling and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) human health risk assessment (HHRA) methodology is based on that approach. One has to have in mind that the total content of elements refers to concentrations of analyzed elements determined after a complete dissolution of the solid matrix with a combination of strong acids i.e., hydrofluoric acid (HF) as well as alkali solutions [18]. However, due to safety precautions HF procedure is not recommended for routine analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an alternative to this procedure is pseudo-total digestion by aqua regia [19]. Although commonly used, aqua regia is often rated as a less suitable solvent for the estimation of the total amount of heavy metals in an environmental matrix [18]. Nevertheless, even high total or pseudototal concentrations of heavy metals do not always pose a threat to the environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%