Comparison of Traditional and Agile Software Development Methodology: A Short Survey

Shaikh, Sarang; Abro, Sindhu

doi:10.15282/ijsecs.5.2.2019.1.0057

Cited by 16 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The analysis of the current procedure describes systematically the activities that occur in the information system of training Training at the end of each year. While the application development process using the waterfall model proposes a systematic and sequential approach to software development that starts at the level and progress of the system in all analysis, design, code, testing, and maintenance [12,13].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Training Information System at PT. Teknik Media Utama Banda Aceh City

Aji¹

2021

ijsecs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this research is; 1) To find out the training information system at PT. Banda Aceh Main Media Engineering, and 2) To design a training information system at PT. Teknik Media Utama Banda Aceh City. FlowMap and data flow diagrams are used to show the general structure of an information. While the application development process using the waterfall model proposes a systematic and sequential approach to software development that starts at the level and progress of the system throughout analysis, design, code, testing, and maintenance. The research results include; 1) Management of training participant database at PT. Teknik Media Utama is ready to replace the old system gradually in a certain parallel period (4-6 months). During that time, the old system is still used to maintain data security and integrity if an error occurs in the new system, 2) The system will be very helpful for users or data managers of trainees at PT. Teknik Media Utama more quickly, easily and accurately in every activity related to training participant data, and 3) The system is very user friendly and in accordance with the needs of the object. Because in designing designs and others, the author does not design based on personal but always consults with users.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Training Information System at PT. Teknik Media Utama Banda Aceh City

Aji¹

2021

ijsecs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In order to examine their available sources on the web, a comparison with 22 application tools for applying them to virtual Kanban boards were done. Sarang Shaikh and Sindhu Abro [73] demonstrated In their paper the distinct specifications, characteristics, crucial practices, advantages and disadvantages of various approaches associated to the application product. In their paper, they utilized six approaches.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Agile Approaches for Cybersecurity Systems, IoT and Intelligent Transportation

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To adapt to the rapidly increasing vulnerabilities in software products and cyber threats that exploit them, security professionals are actively working with software developers to produce more secure systems. In software development, agile methods are increasingly adopted in critical software projects where security risks are prominent challenges. This adoption stems from the fact that agile methods are highly iterative and support delivering services and products in smaller batches which allows security professionals to seamlessly integrate software development security activities with agile methodologies. In addition, the iterative nature of agile software development encourages frequent inspections, tests, and patching of software systems to mitigate cybersecurity risks and vulnerabilities. Considering the massive growth of the Internet of Things (IoT) and Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) products, the challenge of software development while addressing the security and safety concerns of these devices will continue to increase. This paper presents a comprehensive and detailed review of agile software development in the context of IoT, ITS, and their cybersecurity and risk challenges. Furthermore, we provide a systematic comparison of the reviewed literature based on a set of defined criteria. Finally, we provide a broader outlook and an outline for designing future security-enhanced agile software development solutions for IoT and ITS systems.

show abstract

“…The disadvantage of agile is that it does not work effectively in large companies such as government agencies, banks, and insurance, often attributed to slow-moving processes (Shaikh and Abro, 2019). Besides, agile requires the involvement of both users and team members (Shaikh and Abro, 2019). Therefore, the success of development depends heavily on the communication and performance of the entire team.…”

Section: Wangsa Etalmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Therefore, the success of development depends heavily on the communication and performance of the entire team. Nevertheless, agile might not be the best option in a group of more than twenty people due to issues in managing face-to-face communications and the setup complexities (Shaikh and Abro, 2019).…”

Section: Wangsa Etalmentioning

confidence: 99%

A comparative study between design thinking, agile, and design sprint methodologies

Sandu¹,

Wangsa²,

Chugh³

et al. 2022

IJASM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Choosing a suitable problem-solving methodology is vital for project success. Three popular approaches are design thinking, agile and design sprint. To date, a comparative review of these three approaches is missing. This paper provides a comparative outlook between design thinking, agile, and design sprint through a literature review lens. Critical aspects of differentiation between the three approaches centre on time, team composition, flexibility, main focus, goal setting and challenges, whereas the similarities are around problem-solving collaboration and user-centricity. Design thinking applies human-centred design as a key to addressing problem-solving needs. Agile is known for its iterative and incremental processes and is beneficial when uncertainty prevails. Design sprint focuses on a unique five-day process for designing, prototyping, and testing to bridge the gap between design thinking and agile. This study offers insights that will benefit project managers, designers, engineers, or anyone wanting to choose an appropriate approach for problem identification and resolution.

show abstract

Comparison of Traditional and Agile Software Development Methodology: A Short Survey

Cited by 16 publications

References 10 publications

Training Information System at PT. Teknik Media Utama Banda Aceh City

Training Information System at PT. Teknik Media Utama Banda Aceh City

Agile Approaches for Cybersecurity Systems, IoT and Intelligent Transportation

A comparative study between design thinking, agile, and design sprint methodologies

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About