1986
DOI: 10.1016/0270-4684(86)90010-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of trial-and-error and graduated stimulus change procedures across tasks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Through research accomplished in the past 5 years, one can now envision a more complete and possibly more broadly effective program for teaching matching-to-sample baselines to subjects with developmental limitations or disabilities. It would begin by using any of several prompting methods to establish simple form discrimination (e.g., Richmond & Bell, 1986;cf. Sidman & Stoddard, 1966) and perhaps the initial identity matching baseline (Rosenberger et al, 1972).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through research accomplished in the past 5 years, one can now envision a more complete and possibly more broadly effective program for teaching matching-to-sample baselines to subjects with developmental limitations or disabilities. It would begin by using any of several prompting methods to establish simple form discrimination (e.g., Richmond & Bell, 1986;cf. Sidman & Stoddard, 1966) and perhaps the initial identity matching baseline (Rosenberger et al, 1972).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the stimulus control programming methods discussed so far have been developed explicitly because mere differential reinforcement technique are often ineffective with such individuals (Sidman & Stoddard, 1967; Richmond & Bell, 1986). Moreover, until recently, we have had only limited success in research aimed at using programming methods to overcome overselective attending.…”
Section: A Way Forward?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Essas diferenças confirmam relatos da literatura que mostram melhores desempenhos em treinos discriminativos com procedimentos de mudança gradual do que com o procedimento de tentativa-e-erro (e.g., Everett, 1977;Griffiths & Griffiths, 1976;Richmond & Bell, 1986). Logo, os dados desta pesquisa estendem os resultados de estudos anteriores para: tarefas de discriminação simples de posição apresentadas no computador; crianças pré-escolares com desenvolvimento normal e delineamento intra-sujeito.…”
Section: Desempenhos Nos Treinosunclassified