2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2019.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of two DNA extraction methods widely used in aquatic microbial ecology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The same analysis using a higher clustering resolution (ASVs) yielded slightly different results: the bimodality remained significant, while the bimodal hump was weaker and only three ASVs were core. The inaccuracy of molecular methods used to access the microbial biodiversity, from DNA extraction [29], amplification [47], and sequencing errors [48], could bias the interpretation of ecological processes at a high clustering resolution level, such as ASVs. Actually, both methods used to determine taxonomic units are prone to criticism, as they define taxonomy based on an arbitrary threshold value (97% similarity for OTUs; 100% similarity for ASVs), OTU does not consider different diversification rates for each bacterial phylogenetic group, and ASV may artificially overestimate diversity [48].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The same analysis using a higher clustering resolution (ASVs) yielded slightly different results: the bimodality remained significant, while the bimodal hump was weaker and only three ASVs were core. The inaccuracy of molecular methods used to access the microbial biodiversity, from DNA extraction [29], amplification [47], and sequencing errors [48], could bias the interpretation of ecological processes at a high clustering resolution level, such as ASVs. Actually, both methods used to determine taxonomic units are prone to criticism, as they define taxonomy based on an arbitrary threshold value (97% similarity for OTUs; 100% similarity for ASVs), OTU does not consider different diversification rates for each bacterial phylogenetic group, and ASV may artificially overestimate diversity [48].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed description of the molecular procedure and bioinformatics were provided by Mateus-Barros and collaborators [29]. Briefly, we used one half of a filter to extract the bacterial DNA from each sample with phenol-chloroform.…”
Section: Sampling Procedures Molecular Analysis and Bioinformatics For Microbial Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Method 4 was an in-house extraction method, based on the standard phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol protocol [18] with certain modifications. Briefly, 1 mL of each water and the suspension of food was boiled in a water bath for 10 min and then put into ultrasonic bath for additional 10 min in order to cause cell membrane lysis without the use of a chaotropic agent (e.g., phenol).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DNA samples were extracted using the MoBio PowerSoil DNA Isolation Kit (Mo-Bio, Solana Beach, CA, USA) [24]. The amplification conditions for qPCR and primers for the genes are listed in the Supplementary Materials.…”
Section: Qpcr Assay and High-throughput Sequencingmentioning
confidence: 99%