2017
DOI: 10.1111/jdv.14492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of two picosecond lasers to a nanosecond laser for treating tattoos: a prospective randomized study on 49 patients

Abstract: Our results show a statistically significant superiority of the picosecond lasers compared to the nanosecond laser for tattoo clearance. However, they do not show better efficacy for polychromic tattoos and the difference in terms of side-effects was also minimal with a tendency of picosecond lasers to be less painful.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
39
1
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
39
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The pathogenesis of melasma is multifactorial and complicated, and the therapeutic modality should target not only melanin but also photoaging and dermal inflammation. A novel 755‐nm picosecond (ps) alexandrite laser has shown promising results in tattoo and pigmented lesions . With an extremely short pulse duration of 550–750 ps, this laser produces a mainly photomechanical and less photothermal effect, which causes pigment fragmentation while simultaneously minimizing collateral thermal damage and inflammation to the surrounding tissue .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The pathogenesis of melasma is multifactorial and complicated, and the therapeutic modality should target not only melanin but also photoaging and dermal inflammation. A novel 755‐nm picosecond (ps) alexandrite laser has shown promising results in tattoo and pigmented lesions . With an extremely short pulse duration of 550–750 ps, this laser produces a mainly photomechanical and less photothermal effect, which causes pigment fragmentation while simultaneously minimizing collateral thermal damage and inflammation to the surrounding tissue .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A novel 755nm picosecond (ps) alexandrite laser has shown promising results in tattoo and pigmented lesions. 16,17 With an extremely short pulse duration of 550-750 ps, this laser produces a mainly photomechanical and less photothermal effect, which causes pigment fragmentation while simultaneously minimizing collateral thermal damage and inflammation to the surrounding tissue. 18 Furthermore, a diffractive lens array (DLA), which is an innovative optical attachment for the ps laser, was developed to redistribute energy into high-density pulses, similar to the concept of a fractional laser.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The new picosecond-domain lasers not only offer shorter pulse-durations than earlier-generation, nanosecond-domain lasers, but many also offer laser-pumped lasers that deliver the three main wavelengths used to treat multicolor tattoos: 1064 nm infrared laser energy predominantly for removing black ink, 532 nm green light to remove red, yellow, and orange ink, and 755 nm red light to remove blue, green, and purple inks [16,17,[20][21][22][23][24]26,27]. The highest energy will come from the primary wavelength generated from a device, since conservation of energy dictates that there will be loss when converting from one wavelength to another.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Picosecond‐domain lasers have added to the treatment options for laser tattoo removal, joining the Q‐switched, nanosecond‐domain devices that have been the mainstay for laser tattoo removal using selective photothermolysis . The shorter pulse‐durations offered by picosecond‐domain lasers were developed to remove tattoos in fewer treatments, as compared to nanosecond‐domain devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, a single-blind split randomized trial in 30 black professional tattoos treated with a picosecond 1064 nm neodymium-doped: yttrium aluminum (Nd : YAG) laser versus QS 1064 nm Nd : YAG found no significant difference in efficacy after two treatments (Pinto et al, 2017). In contrast, Lorgeou et al, in a more recent single-blind split randomized trial among 49 patients treated with a picosecond 1064/532 nm laser and QS 1064/532 nm laser, found the picosecond laser more effective for reducing at least 75% of tattoo color intensity (Lorgeou, Perrillat, Gral, et al, 2017). This case exemplifies the effectiveness of a triple-wavelength treatment in the ablation of a polychromatic tattoo of unknown ink and ingredients.…”
Section: Dear Editormentioning
confidence: 99%