2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of two TCATA variants for dynamic sensory characterization of food products

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
51
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
51
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…No difference in perceived mouthfeel was observed in Cabernet sauvignon wines. The Pinot noir wine (PN1) showed a dip in the perception of “grippy mouthfeel” at 20 s and had the lowest perceived “astringency.” Although, Ares et al () suggested that panelists could be slow to uncheck an attribute when it no longer applies, the 20 s dip in our study could refute this when TCATA is carried out with a panel familiar with the product they are assessing. An interesting result is the PN1 wine, which had the lowest tannin concentration in the wine, but was the one that experienced the dip in the perception of “grippy.” Higher alcohol levels have been reported to harden the tannin perception in wines (Noble, ) but there was no statistical difference between alcohol levels in the Pinot noir wines.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…No difference in perceived mouthfeel was observed in Cabernet sauvignon wines. The Pinot noir wine (PN1) showed a dip in the perception of “grippy mouthfeel” at 20 s and had the lowest perceived “astringency.” Although, Ares et al () suggested that panelists could be slow to uncheck an attribute when it no longer applies, the 20 s dip in our study could refute this when TCATA is carried out with a panel familiar with the product they are assessing. An interesting result is the PN1 wine, which had the lowest tannin concentration in the wine, but was the one that experienced the dip in the perception of “grippy.” Higher alcohol levels have been reported to harden the tannin perception in wines (Noble, ) but there was no statistical difference between alcohol levels in the Pinot noir wines.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…In the second option, the panelists clicked the descriptor when they began to perceive the sensation but the descriptor slowly faded off unless the panelist re‐clicked the description. Consequently, the fading technique discussed by Ares et al () and Jaeger et al () was not utilized in our study. The panel unanimously agreed that the fading method was cognitively challenging, and some panelists expressed confusion between the descriptor fading to off, and a rating of intensity (rather than presence) of the sensation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Last, no attribute extinction times were found for any of the samples. This may be due to the consumers being more attentive with identifying onset than offset of sensations (Ares et al, ), or simply an artifact arising from the relatively short time frame of the study (60 s). Future work should be conducted with a longer time frame using TCATA fading.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future work should be conducted with a longer time frame using TCATA fading. In TCATA fading, the selected attributes gradually fade so that it is obvious to assessors that the attribute is no longer present (Ares et al, ). To confirm that the attribute is still present, the participant must actively click on the attribute again before it fades into the same shade as the unselected attributes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To capture the concurrent sensations at each moment of the evaluation, multiple attributes can be selected simultaneously. TCATA has been used to profile dynamic perception of different products, such as milk, yogurt, cheese, bread and even cosmetic creams (Ares et al, ; Boinbaser, Parente, Castura, & Ares, ; Castura et al ; Meyners & Castura, ; Oliveira et al, ). Due to similar sensory protocols and data treatment procedures, TDS and TCATA have been compared on a number of factors, including power to discriminate products, reproducibility, drivers of (dis)liking, consensus among panelists, and ease of use (Ares et al, ; Ares et al, ; Esmerino et al, ; Nguyen, Naes, & Varela, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%