Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare the efectiveness of a lexion spacer in the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and to compare these patients to a group of patients subjected to the same type of surgery but without the use of a lexion spacer. It was hypothesized that patients who underwent TKA using a lexion spacer would have better clinical and radiological outcomes than those without a lexion spacer in both short-and medium-term follow-ups. Methods A consecutive series of patients undergoing TKA were included, yielding 20 patients in the study group. The control group was identiied from the consultant database of the senior author, yielding 21 patients who underwent the same operation. All 41 patients received a Vanguard Knee System (Zimmer-Biomet, Warsaw, Indiana, USA). Cases were deined as those patients who had undergone TKA using a lexion spacer device for gap balancing; controls were deined as patients who had undergone TKA without the support of a lexion spacer device. Patients were clinically and radiographically evaluated at two consecutive follow-ups: T 1 -13.1 ± 1.3 months and T 2 -108 ± 6 months. Clinical evaluation was performed using the Knee Society Scoring System and the Western Ontario, McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score. Radiographic evaluation included the femoral angle (α), the tibial angle (β), the sagittal femoral (γ) angle and the tibial slope (δ). Furthermore, the lateral patellofemoral angle (LPFA) and the Caton-Deschamps index were evaluated.
ResultsNo statistically signiicant clinical diferences were found between the two groups at T 1 and T 2 ; moreover, the clinical outcomes of the two groups were stable between the two follow-ups, with no signiicant improvement or worsening. Radiographic evaluation showed no diference in the two groups between T 1 and T 2 ; the only signiicant radiographic diference between the two groups concerned the LPFA (both at 30° and 60°) at each follow-up, which was signiicantly greater in cases than in controls (p = 0.001). Conclusions The current study demonstrates that the use of a lexion spacer signiicantly improves radiographic patellofemoral tracking, although no signiicant clinical diferences were found between the two groups. Level of evidence Case-control study, level III.