2018
DOI: 10.1177/1129729818769227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of two types of catheters through femoral vein catheterization in patients with lung cancer undergoing chemotherapy: A retrospective study

Abstract: Single-lumen power-injectable peripherally inserted central catheters with no valve had a high gravity flow rate, were strong and not prone to rupture, tolerant to high-pressure injection, and were more suitable for femorally inserted central venous catheterization in patients with lung cancer undergoing chemotherapy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) is an intravenous device 1 inserted into the central veins via the peripheral veins [2][3][4][5] (eg, basilic vein, 2 antecubital vein, 2 cephalic vein, 3 brachial vein 3 and femoral vein), 4 5 which are commonly used for prolonged intravenous therapy, blood and nutrition administrations, and frequent blood sampling. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10] It is regarded as a safe, efficient and cost-effective intravenous device due to long indwelling time, reduced vascular damage without repeated puncture, and convenient insertion and removal without the necessity for general anaesthesia or deep cutting and suturing of the wounds. 2 3 9-11 However, its complications cannot be ignored, including thrombosis, 4 5 12-14 catheter exit site infections, 4 bloodstream infections, 12 13 15 accidental dislodgement, 5 11 12 malposition, 11 occlusion, 4 5 11 12 16 leakage, 12 breakage, 5 12 phlebitis 12 and cardiac tamponade.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) is an intravenous device 1 inserted into the central veins via the peripheral veins [2][3][4][5] (eg, basilic vein, 2 antecubital vein, 2 cephalic vein, 3 brachial vein 3 and femoral vein), 4 5 which are commonly used for prolonged intravenous therapy, blood and nutrition administrations, and frequent blood sampling. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10] It is regarded as a safe, efficient and cost-effective intravenous device due to long indwelling time, reduced vascular damage without repeated puncture, and convenient insertion and removal without the necessity for general anaesthesia or deep cutting and suturing of the wounds. 2 3 9-11 However, its complications cannot be ignored, including thrombosis, 4 5 12-14 catheter exit site infections, 4 bloodstream infections, 12 13 15 accidental dislodgement, 5 11 12 malposition, 11 occlusion, 4 5 11 12 16 leakage, 12 breakage, 5 12 phlebitis 12 and cardiac tamponade.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite several studies were conducted, a number of relevant points with the use of PICC in cancer patients remain unsettled. In particular, the choice of the best PICC type (e.g., with or without distal valve, open-or closed-tip, in polyurethane or silicone, etc) for chemotherapy administration has been examined, but is still open to discussion [3,4,[15][16][17]. In this population of both in-patients and out-patients with cancer, we were able to compare the performances of closed-tip and open-tip PICCs over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[22] Power-injectable PICCs like POWERPICC ® (Bard Access systems Inc., UT 84116, USA) are designed to withstand the higher pressures of computed tomography contrast infusion and are preferred in oncological patients who may require frequent scans. [23]…”
Section: Types Of Vascular Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%