1982
DOI: 10.1128/jb.149.1.247-254.1982
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Unitrophic and Mixotrophic Substrate Metabolism by an Acetate-Adapted Strain of Methanosarcina barkeri

Abstract: We examined the unitrophic metabolism of acetate and methanol individually and the mixotrophic utilization of these compounds by using detailed 14C-labeled tracer studies in a strain of Methanosarcina barkeri adapted to grow on acetate as the sole carbon and energy source. The substrate consumption rate and methane production rate were significantly lower on acetate alone than during the unitrophic or mixotrophic metabolism of methanol. Cell yields (in grams per mole of substrate) were identical during exponen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
46
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
6
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this pathway, CO-DH is the central enzyme of the catabolic pathway. This is in accord with the finding of Krzycki et al [83] that the activity of CO-DH is 5 × higher in cells grown on acetate than in cells grown on CO~ and H: or methanol. It has been proposed that ATP is generated by electron and proton phosphorylation [84].…”
Section: Catabolism Of Aceo'l-coa By Methanogenssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In this pathway, CO-DH is the central enzyme of the catabolic pathway. This is in accord with the finding of Krzycki et al [83] that the activity of CO-DH is 5 × higher in cells grown on acetate than in cells grown on CO~ and H: or methanol. It has been proposed that ATP is generated by electron and proton phosphorylation [84].…”
Section: Catabolism Of Aceo'l-coa By Methanogenssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Y XS 10·8 g mol −1 (D 0·046 h −1 , S 0 125 mmol l −1 ) from Table 2 and Y XS 4·0 g mol −1 (D 0·05 h −1 , S 0 150 mmol l −1 ) (Bainotti et al 1998), respectively. The latter value is comparable with that obtained for Methanosarcina barkeri (Y XS 3·9 g mol −1 , m 0·039 h −1 ) on methanol (Krzycki et al 1982).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Therefore, the cell yield coefficient (g mol −1 ) and specific growth rate of Acetobacterium sp. (Y XS 10·8, m 0·046 h −1 , on methanol-formate) are considerably higher than those reported for M. barkeri (Y XS 3·9, m 0·039 h −1 , on methanol) (Krzycki et al 1982).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The P tet vht and P tet vht/ Δ ech mutants were not examined because they do not grow in any medium under non-inducing conditions. Similarly, we did not assay production of methane from acetate, because prior growth on acetate is required to induce the enzymes needed for this activity and most of the hydrogenase mutants are unable to grow under these conditions (20, 21).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%