2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.07.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of UV/H2O2 and UV/TiO2 for the degradation of metaldehyde: Kinetics and the impact of background organics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
1
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
40
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is particularly pertinent in the case of pesticides, where several widelyused active substances regularly cause water quality problems in a number of drinking water catchments (Kennedy 2010;Kennedy et al 2009;Defra 2012). These problems are especially acute for compounds that are not removed significantly by current water treatment technologies, such as metaldehyde (Autin et al 2012) and clopyralid (Tizaoui et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is particularly pertinent in the case of pesticides, where several widelyused active substances regularly cause water quality problems in a number of drinking water catchments (Kennedy 2010;Kennedy et al 2009;Defra 2012). These problems are especially acute for compounds that are not removed significantly by current water treatment technologies, such as metaldehyde (Autin et al 2012) and clopyralid (Tizaoui et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Degradation products were not detected during metaldehyde photocatalysis with UV/TiO 2 [12], although volatile by-products in this system, if present, would probably have been lost during the sample treatment carried out, which involving sample preconcentration with styrene divinylbenzene cartridges. This is because of the high volatility of the possible degradation products and limited adsorption onto the stationary phase due to the short hydrocarbon skeleton of the possible degradation products.…”
Section: Immobilisation Of Slgo Onto Cellulose Tape and An Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…For example, Busquets et al noted the improved adsorption of metaldehyde using "tailored" activated carbon beads (i.e. with controlled surface chemistry and pore size distribution) synthesised from phenolic resin [10,11], while Autin et al reported successful photodegradation of metaldehyde using UV/H 2 O 2 and UV/TiO 2 (although the effectiveness of metaldehyde removal was significantly reduced by the presence of background organic matter) [12]. Bing and Fletcher report the destruction of metaldehyde using sulfonic acid functionalized mesoporous silica [13], and ion exchange resins with sulfonic acid groups in a system that can also adsorb any acetaldehyde generated [14] , while Nabeerasool et al report effective removal of metaldehyde using a coupled batch adsorption/ electrochemical regeneration technique, based on low capacity graphitic material (Arvia TM process) [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 The kinetics of the heterogeneous photocatalytic reactions is typically correlated to the LangmuirHinschelwood model. 34,37,38 Considering that the concentration of reactive species (RS) formed in the reaction sites must quickly achieve a stationary regimen, 39,40 remaining nearly constant during all the photocatalytic process, the rate law can be expressed by equation 1: (3) which, considering that is k app , the apparent rate constant of the reaction, can be rewritten as (4) Vol. 27, No.…”
Section: Control Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34,37,38 Considering that the concentration of reactive species (RS) formed in the reaction sites must quickly achieve a stationary regimen, 39,40 remaining nearly constant during all the photocatalytic process, the rate law can be expressed by equation 1:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%