2012 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/aim.2012.6265960
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of various active impedance control approaches, modeling, implementation, passivity, stability and trade-offs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…procedure ControllerSolver(f n , ζ 1 , ζ 2 , sysParam) Deterministically solve nominal controller gains K qn , B qn , K τn , B τn refer to (16) if Gain scale GS = 1 then…”
Section: Sea Impedance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…procedure ControllerSolver(f n , ζ 1 , ζ 2 , sysParam) Deterministically solve nominal controller gains K qn , B qn , K τn , B τn refer to (16) if Gain scale GS = 1 then…”
Section: Sea Impedance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Series elastic actuators [11,12,13,14,15], as an emerging actuation mechanism, provide considerable advantages in compliant and safe environmental interactions, impact absorption, energy storage and force sensing. In the control literature, adopting cascaded impedance control architectures for series elastic actuators (SEAs) has attracted increasing investigations over the last few years [16,13,17]. Compared to full-state feedback control [18,19,20], the cascaded control performs superior when the controlled plant comprises slow dynamics and fast dynamics simultaneously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2) Stiffness range: SEA physical stiffness needs to be carefully selected to trade off intrinsic compliance, accuracy of force measurement, displacement range and bandwidth of force control [9], [10], [14], [15]. Furthermore, when addressing rehabilitation of joints with intrinsic compliance, the values of physical stiffness of the human counterpart in resting and pathological conditions also needs to be taken into account.…”
Section: A Definition Of Design Specificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stiffness of the ankle pitch passive compliant joint is 520[N m/rad]. The impedance regulator [31] is used to supply nonlinear torques (12) to the ankle. The inner loop torque controller proposed in [31], is exploited, and an outer loop based on (12) is closed on the link side, to provide the reference torque of the torque controller.…”
Section: Humanoid Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%