Comparison of VOC measurements made by PTR-MS, adsorbent tubes–GC-FID-MS and DNPH derivatization–HPLC during the Sydney Particle Study, 2012: a contribution to the assessment of uncertainty in routine atmospheric VOC measurements

Abstract

Abstract. Understanding uncertainty is essential for utilizing atmospheric volatile organic compound (VOC) measurements in robust ways to develop atmospheric science. This study describes an inter-comparison of the VOC data, and the derived uncertainty estimates, measured with three independent techniques (PTR-MS, proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry; GC-FID-MS, gas chromatography with flameionization and mass spectrometric detection; and DNPH-HPLC, 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine derivatization followed by analysis by high-performance liquid chromatography) during routine monitoring as part of the Sydney Particle Study (SPS) campaign in 2012. Benzene, toluene, C 8 aromatics, isoprene, formaldehyde and acetaldehyde were selected for the comparison, based on objective selection criteria from the available data. Bottom-up uncertainty analyses were undertaken for each compound and each measurement system. Top-down uncertainties were quantified via the intercomparisons. In all seven comparisons, the correlations between independent measurement techniques were high with R 2 values with a median of 0.92 (range 0.75-0.98) and small root mean square of the deviations (RMSD) of the observations from the regression line with a median of 0.11 (range 0.04-0.23 ppbv). These results give a high degree of confidence that for each comparison the response of the two independent techniques is dominated by the same constituents. The slope and intercept as determined by reduced major axis (RMA) regression gives a different story. The slopes varied considerably with a median of 1.25 and a range of 1.16-2.01. The intercepts varied with a median of 0.04 and a range of −0.03 to 0.31 ppbv. An ideal comparison would give a slope of 1.00 and an intercept of 0.Some sources of uncertainty that are poorly quantified by the bottom-up uncertainty analysis method were identified, including: contributions of non-target compounds to the measurement of the target compound for benzene, toluene and isoprene by PTR-MS as well as the under-reporting of formaldehyde, acetaldehyde and acetone by the DNPH technique. As well as these, this study has identified a specific interference of liquid water with acetone measurements by the DNPH technique.These relationships reported for Sydney 2012 were incorporated into a larger analysis with 61 similar published inter-comparison studies for the same compounds. Overall, for the light aromatics, isoprene and the C 1 -C 3 carbonyls, the uncertainty in a set of measurements varies by a factor of between 1.5 and 2. These uncertainties (∼ 50 %) are significantly higher than uncertainties estimated using standard propagation of error methods, which in this case were ∼ 22 % or less, and are the result of the presence of poorly understood or neglected processes that affect the measurement and its uncertainty. The uncertainties in VOC measurements identified here should be considered when assessing the reliability of VOC measurements from routine monitoring with individual, stand-alone instruments; when utilizing VOC da...

Biogenic volatile organic compound ambient mixing ratios and emission rates in the Alaskan Arctic tundra

“…Figure S2 shows a comparison of the GC-MS and PTR-ToF-MS isoprene mixing ratios in ambient air. With a correlation coefficient of 0.93 and a linear regression slope of 0.7-1.0, the two measurements agreed within their combined measurement uncertainties, in line with earlier intercomparison studies (e.g., Dunne et al, 2018;de Gouw et al, 2003). Similarly, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.96 between GC-MS and PTR-ToF-MS MVK and MACR mixing ratios (not shown).…”

Spatial and Temporal Distributions and Sources of Anthropogenic NMVOCs in the Atmosphere of China: A Review

“…This advancement provided the ability to quickly capture the low concentration of tracers. The common used online monitoring instruments are proton-transfer reaction mass spectrometry (PTR-MS) and the remolding of other basic online instrumentation, and the development and application methods of online instruments have been well-reviewed in previous studies (Kaser et al, 2013;Yuan et al, 2017;Dunne et al, 2018). Zhang et al (2020a) measured NMHCs by GC-FID in Shanghai, and the results showed that the largest contribution to NMHCs are alkanes and the ratio of NMHCs to NO x should be no less than 0.72, to effectively control the increase of O 3 .…”

Composition of Clean Marine Air and Biogenic Influences on VOCs during the MUMBA Campaign

“…A commercial PTR-MS (IONICON) equipped with a quadrupole mass spectrometer was used in this study along with custom-built auxiliary equipment [35,49] that allows automated calibration and zero measurements. Zero measurements were performed twice daily for 40 min each time (at 00:50 and at 15:00) by sampling ambient air that had been stripped of VOCs by passing through a platinum-coated glass wool catalyst heated to 350 • C. A multi-species, single-point calibration was performed daily (from 01:30 until 03:00) by introducing a known flow of calibration standard into the zero-air stream.…”