2017
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1383(17)30737-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of volar and dorsal plate osteosynthesis for radial shaft fractures: an anatomical pilot study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They concluded that plate contouring was necessary and precontoured plates would be desirable. 6 The dorsal precontoured plate, on the other hand, matched the anatomy much more reliably. In fact, at each plate segment, there was no statistical difference in plate offset from the bone comparing the precontoured with the surgeon-contoured plates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They concluded that plate contouring was necessary and precontoured plates would be desirable. 6 The dorsal precontoured plate, on the other hand, matched the anatomy much more reliably. In fact, at each plate segment, there was no statistical difference in plate offset from the bone comparing the precontoured with the surgeon-contoured plates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…[1][2][3][4][5] While fixation of an ulnar diaphyseal fracture can usually be performed with a straight plate, fixation of the radius often requires a plate contoured in the sagittal, coronal, and potentially axial planes, to match the 3-dimensional radial bow. [6][7][8] The standard plate used for adult diaphyseal forearm fractures is a 3.5 mm dynamic compression plate. Contouring this relatively rigid plate in 3 planes can be complex and time consuming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The treatment method of choice for forearm diaphyseal fractures is ORIF. Therefore, the radius shaft can be reached through either Henry's or Thompson's approach for volar or dorsal plate osteosynthesis, respectively (Holweg et al, 2017). Thompson's approach is conducted through a dorsolateral incision on the forearm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, intramedullary stabilization may be performed (Saka et al, 2014); however, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) represents the treatment of choice. (Hughston, 1957;Anderson et al, 1975) Therefore, the radius shaft can be reached through either Henry's (volar) or Thompson's (dorsal) approach which enable exposition alongside the whole radial length (RL) (Holweg et al, 2017). However, the anatomy of the forearm is challenging, due to various muscles, nerves, and vascular structures, whereby some of these characteristics change position during forearm rotation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is especially true of forearm diaphyseal fracture xation where the bowed radius rotates nearly 180° about the ulna [1,2]. Accordingly, incomplete reconstitution of the radial bow during fracture surgery in both location and magnitude has been linked to reduced forearm rotation and suboptimal functional outcomes as well as altered kinematics [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] A radius bone plate often requires contouring in the sagittal, coronal, and axial planes, to match the threedimensional radial bow [3,4,7,11,12]. The radius of curvature is most pronounced on the volar and dorsal aspects of the bone, corresponding with the two most common surgical approaches to a radial shaft fracture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%