Comparison of wearable sensor to traditional methods in functional outcome measures: A systematic review

Abstract

Traditional methods of collecting functional outcome measures are widely used for lower extremity arthroplasty outcome assessment. Wearable sensors are emerging as viable tools for functional outcome measures in monitoring of postarthroplasty recovery. The objective of this review was to compare the efficacy of wearable sensors with traditional methods for monitoring postarthroplasty functional recovery. Articles were searched for inclusion in this review that used both traditional and wearable sensor functional outcome measures to assess lower extremity function before and after lower extremity arthroplasty. Two independent screeners reviewed all articles, and resolved differences through consensus and consultation with the senior author. Studies that met inclusion criteria were evaluated for methodologic quality using performed risk of bias assessments. Results from several traditional and wearable sensor functional outcome measures from baseline through follow-up were normalized across studies. Fourteen articles met the inclusion criteria. Six studies used statistical methods to directly compare functional outcome measures and eight studies used qualitative description of comparisons. This review found evidence that wearable sensors detected nuanced functional outcome information on the specific biomechanics and timing of recovery, which were unaccounted for using traditional methods. Wearable sensors have shown promising utility in providing additional recovery information from lower extremity arthroplasty compared with traditional functional outcome measures, but future research is needed to assess the clinical significance of this additional information.Wearable sensor technology is an emerging clinical tool providing advanced and determinative data with the potential for advancing the assessment of lower extremity arthroplasty outcomes.

Inertial Measurement Units and Application for Remote Health Care in Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis: Narrative Review

“…Importantly, both reviews identified the need to validate inertial sensor assessment of gait in free-living environments. Another review focused solely on wearable sensors in assessing functional outcome measures after lower extremity arthroplasty and found wearable sensors to be more sensitive than traditional functional outcome measures [73]. Both this review and the current one suggest that more work is needed to understand the clinical relevance of sensor measures.…”

Value-based Healthcare: Three Ways Healthcare Systems Can Get More Usage Out of Their Patient Engagement Tools

“…Digital phenotyping, defined as the moment-by-moment capture of an individual’s activity using data from smartphones or wearable sensors, is one such approach that allows passive capture of continuous patient-generated activity, behavior, and communications data as biomarkers of health [4]. Investigators, including those at the University of California San Francisco, are using wearable sensors and mobile applications as tools for assessing functional outcomes and assessing physical performance prior to and following total knee replacement [1]. Natural language processing of open unstructured video, audio, and free text might also offer new technology-enabled opportunities to minimize the burden on patients and improve their experiences using less obtrusive patient engagement tools.…”

Rehabilitation of Total Knee Arthroplasty by Integrating Conjoint Isometric Myodynamia and Real‐Time Rotation Sensing System

“…To achieve postoperative and longitudinal rehabilitation monitoring of patients, wearable technologies, mainly based on inertial measurement units (IMUs) with accelerometers and gyroscopes, are proposed. [ 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 ] IMUs are able to measure the knee bending motions, but cannot assess myodynamia. Additionally, the IMUs measure indirectly, requiring complicated body parameters for post computational modeling to calculate out the motions, and extra corrections, from time to time, to reduce the misalignment error that grows as a function of time.…”