2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Wilhelmy plate and Sessile drop methods to rank moisture damage susceptibility of asphalt – Aggregates combinations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The contact angle of the probe liquid with the surface of the asphalt binder can be determined from simple force equilibrium conditions which is the difference between weight of a plate measured in air and partially submerged in a probe liquid was expressed in terms of liquid surface energy, buoyancy of the liquid, geometry of the plate and contact angle. The surface energy was calculated using the mathematical models presented by Little and Bhasin, [9] and Habal and Singh, [4]. Table 4 exhibit the influence of aging process and implementation of recycling agents on rheological properties of asphalt cement.…”
Section: Determination Of Surface Free Energy Of Recycled Asphalt Cemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The contact angle of the probe liquid with the surface of the asphalt binder can be determined from simple force equilibrium conditions which is the difference between weight of a plate measured in air and partially submerged in a probe liquid was expressed in terms of liquid surface energy, buoyancy of the liquid, geometry of the plate and contact angle. The surface energy was calculated using the mathematical models presented by Little and Bhasin, [9] and Habal and Singh, [4]. Table 4 exhibit the influence of aging process and implementation of recycling agents on rheological properties of asphalt cement.…”
Section: Determination Of Surface Free Energy Of Recycled Asphalt Cemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of aging time on physical and rheological properties of asphalt cement such as penetration, softening point, ductility, stiffness modulus, surface free energy, penetration index and bending beam rheometer BBR before and after thin film oven test with various aging periods have been modeled. Two techniques namely Wilhelmy plate (WP) and Sessile drop (SD) methods to rank moisture damage susceptibility of twelve different asphalt-aggregate combinations have been compared by Habal and Singh, [4]. Three asphalt binders: unmodified, polymer modified, and crumb rubber modified binders, and four aggregates (basalt, limestone, granite, and sandstone) were selected in their study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The separation area of asphalt and aggregate is defined as adhesion failure area S a , and asphalt's own separation area is defined as the cohesion failure area S c . The relationship between tensile failure load F and the overall tensile strength R t could be expressed by formula (7). While relationship among tensile failure load F, strength of adhesion R a , failure area of adhesion S a , strength of cohesion R c and failure area of cohesion S c could be expressed by formula (8)…”
Section: The Principle Of the Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the years, many elaborate studies have been performed to study this topic. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8] Specifically, academician Sha 9 systematically studied the reasons of the early stage moisture damages in asphalt pavement and proposed the corresponding solution. Some research had calculated and analysed moisture damage problems of asphalt pavement by creating numerical simulation model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contact angles of water and diiodomethane on the epoxy matrix were measured using the sessile drop method [33]. W ad can be estimated by applying Fowke's theory [34] and the Young-Dupré equation [35] according to the geometric mean method, as given in the following eq (4): (4) where g s is the surface energetic of the CFs listed in Table 1, g L is the surface energetic of the epoxy matrix used and = 37.5 mN/m and = 5.8 mN/m [36].…”
Section: Surface Properties Of Cfsmentioning
confidence: 99%