Comparison of X-shaped metallic dampers with fluid viscous dampers and influence of their placement on seismic response of the building

Chukka, Naga Dheeraj Kumar Reddy; Krishnamurthy, Muthumani

doi:10.1007/s42107-019-00151-z

Cited by 10 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To model the hybrid damper in [18] (2009), plastic (Wen) link element was used. Plastic (Wen) link element was used to model the hysteretic dampers such as the XMD [19] and the FD [20] successfully. Kim and Shin [21] developed a slit-friction hybrid damper and performed experimental analysis on that damper.…”

Section: Modeling For Nonlinear Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Seismic Fragility and Life Cycle Cost Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Structures with a Hybrid Damper

Chukka

Natrayan

Mammo

2021

Advances in Civil Engineering

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The main objective of this research is to develop a hybrid damper by combining the friction damper (FD) and the X-shaped metallic damper (XMD) to enhance the performance of a building under seismic excitations with different peak ground accelerations (PGA). Four- and twelve-storey-reinforced concrete buildings were retrofitted with the hybrid damper, and seismic fragility, nonlinear dynamic, and life cycle cost analyses were executed on both structures to evaluate the performance of the hybrid damper and are compared with the FD and XMD of same yield load. According to the nonlinear dynamic analysis results, when a four-storey structure is installed with the XMD, FD, and hybrid dampers, the percentage of deduction of the average of the maximum interstorey drifts is 63, 67, and 74, respectively. When a twelve-storey structure is installed with the XMD, FD, and hybrid dampers, the percentage of deduction of the average of the maximum interstorey drifts is 59, 64, and 71, respectively. So the performance of the hybrid damper is superior to the XMD and FD in reducing interstorey drift of both structures. Results also show that the hybrid damper has enhanced the energy dissipation capacity compared to the XMD and FD under earthquakes with both low and high PGA values. According to fragility analysis results, the performance of the hybrid damper is superior to the XMD and FD in reducing the probability of attaining the collapse state. Life cycle cost analysis results show that structures with the hybrid damper acquired the shortest repair time and lowest repair cost.

show abstract

Section: Modeling For Nonlinear Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%