2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11220-018-0200-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison Study of Regularizations in Spectral Computed Tomography Reconstruction

Abstract: The energy-resolving photon-counting detectors in spectral computed tomography (CT) can acquire projections of an object in different energy channels. In other words, they are able to reliably distinguish the received photon energies. These detectors lead to the emerging spectral CT, which is also called multi-energy CT, energy-selective CT, color CT, etc. Spectral CT can provide additional information in comparison with the conventional CT in which energy integrating detectors are used to acquire polychromati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, this method has the drawback of not being able to correct for the effect of beam hardening. The bin images can be reconstructed with filtered backprojection or with an iterative algorithm similar to those used for single-energy CT (Salehjahromi et al 2018). By summing the images with carefully selected weight factors, the optimal CNR for a specific imaging task can then be attained (Schmidt 2009).…”
Section: Energy Bin Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, this method has the drawback of not being able to correct for the effect of beam hardening. The bin images can be reconstructed with filtered backprojection or with an iterative algorithm similar to those used for single-energy CT (Salehjahromi et al 2018). By summing the images with carefully selected weight factors, the optimal CNR for a specific imaging task can then be attained (Schmidt 2009).…”
Section: Energy Bin Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the former category, material decomposition is carried out in the image domain, while in the latter category, it is carried out in the projection domain (see figure 2). In both approaches, independent methods for material decomposition in the projection domain [22], (multi-channel) spectral reconstruction [23] with various forms of structural or spectral regularization [24][25][26], and material decomposition in the image domain [15] can be plugged in. Although these sequential two-step methods are computationally inexpensive, separating the reconstruction and decomposition steps causes information loss [27,28].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both approaches, independent methods for material decomposition in the projection domain [22], (multi-channel) spectral reconstruction [23] with various forms of structural or spectral regularization [24,25,26], and material decomposition in the image domain [15] can be plugged in. Although these sequential two-step methods are computationally inexpensive, separating the reconstruction and unmixing steps causes information loss [27,28].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%