Comparison Tensile Strength of Natural and Synthetic Absorbable Sutures

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the investigation is to evaluate and to compare the tensile strength of commercial natural and synthetic absorbable suturematerials currently used in surgery. The natural absorbable sutures of chromic catgut are prepared for this purpose as well as commercial syntheticabsorbable sutures made from polyglycolide.Methods: The analysis has been carried out following the standard test method for tensile strength and Young’s modulus of fiber ASTM C1557-03.Measuring the diameter of each suture has been carried out with an optical microscope to determine the accuracy of manufacturers’ data. Tensiletesting has been performed to evaluate the tensile strength of each type of sutures. The modulus elasticity and strain (ϵ) obtained are also presented.Results: The results show that sutures made from braided synthetic material of polyglycolide (violet coated) present a tensile strength remarkablysuperior (1070.292 MPa) to that of natural absorbable sutures of chromic catgut (392.276 MPa). Using optical macro microscope analysis,monofilament sutures present less surface irregularities than multifilament polyglycolide sutures. Chromic catgut monofilament sutures present lesssurface irregularities than multifilament polyglycolide.Conclusion: Tensile test of absorbable sutures was conducted in this research. Two types of absorbable sutures were investigated and compared. It isfound that sutures made from braided synthetic material of polyglycolide (violet coated) having much better tensile strength comparing with suturesmade from natural material (chromic catgut monofilament).

On Investigation of Tensile Strength of Commercial Synthetic Non-Absorbable Suture Made From of Blue Polypropylene Monofilament

“…Tensile strength data assist the surgeon in selection and application of appropriate suture materials to specific tasks [11]. Table 3 is comparison of tensile properties to absorbable sutures obtained from previous investigation [9]. The non-absorbable suture in this research is found superior above tensile strength of natural absorbable sutures (chromic catgut monofilament).…”

“…Specific brand seems to be the most important determinant of physician evaluations Fig. 4: Modulus elasticity of some sutures, namely: Natural absorbable (chromic catgut monofilament) [9], synthetic absorbable (braided violet coated polyglycolide [9], to be compared with synthetic non-absorbable (blue, polypropylene, monofilament) that is investigated in this research Fig. 3: Tensile strength and failure at strain of some sutures, namely, natural absorbable (chromic catgut monofilament) [9], synthetic absorbable (braided violet coated polyglycolide) [9], and synthetic non-absorbable (blue, polypropylene, monofilament) that is investigated in this work…”